Mr.S.S.Suganthan filed a consumer case on 07 Jun 2022 against The Director The Park Town Benefit Fund in the North Chennai Consumer Court. The case no is CC/143/2018 and the judgment uploaded on 09 Jul 2022.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
CHENNAI (NORTH)
@ 2ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.
PRESENT : THIRU. G. VINOBHA, M.A., B.L., :PRESIDENT
TMT. KAVITHA KANNAN, M.E., : MEMBER-I
THIRU.V.RAMAMURTHY,B.A.,B.L.,PGDLA., :MEMBER-II
TUESDAY THE 07rd DAY OF JUNE 2022
C.C.NO.143/2018
S.S.Suganthan
D-10 Maruti Apartments,
87, Dr.Alagappa Road,
Purasawalkam,
Chennai 600 084.
…..Complainant
..Vs..
1.The Director,
The Park Town Benefit Fund Ltd.,
No.8, Mahalakshmi Street,
T.Nagar,
Chennai 600 017.
2. The Branch Manager
The Park Town Benefit Fund Ltd.,
P-995, II Avenue, 12th Main Road,
Anna Nagar Junction,
Chennai-600 040.
| .....Opposite Parties
|
|
Counsel for Complainant : M/s. Consumer Association of India
Counsel for opposite party : M/s.T.K.S. Gandhi & N.M.karthikeyan
ORDER
BY PRESIDENT THIRU. G.VINOBHA, M.A.,B.L.,
This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.
The complainant filed this complaint against the opposite party to pay the principal balance amount Rs.11,750/- and to pay the balance interest Rs.2320/- and to pay interest at the rate of 18% per annum from 19.04.2002 for the principal balance Rs.11,750/- till the date of payment for the said amount and to pay compensation for mental agony and suffering caused by the opposite party by his deficiency of service Rs.5,000/- to pay costs Rs.2,000/-.
Complainant and opposite party absent inspite of notice sent to them by RPAD. No representation on either side. W.P.No.42787/2004 and W.P.35512/2004 already disposed by Hon’ble High Court of Madras on 02.08.2007 following a scheme for payment to all the depositors by the Park Town Benefit Fund by appointing a special officer for repayment of deposit amount to depositors. The parties might have settled the matter as per scheme approved by company law board in C.P.No.91/2010. Hence party has no interest in prosecuting this complaint before this commission. No useful purpose will be served in keeping this matter pending. Hence this complaint is closed.
Order Pronounced dated 07th June 2022.
MEMBER I MEMBER II PRESIDENT
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.