The Director, M/S Bansal Oil Mill Ltd. V/S Sri Anil Kumar Gupta.
Sri Anil Kumar Gupta. filed a consumer case on 13 Jan 2010 against The Director, M/S Bansal Oil Mill Ltd. in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is FA/514/2009 and the judgment uploaded on 30 Nov -0001.
West Bengal
StateCommission
FA/514/2009
Sri Anil Kumar Gupta. - Complainant(s)
Versus
The Director, M/S Bansal Oil Mill Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)
Mr. Saraj Kumar Das.
13 Jan 2010
ORDER
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION , WEST BENGALBHAWANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor), 31 Belvedere Road. Kolkata -700027
APPEAL NO. 514 of 2009
1. Sri Anil Kumar Gupta.Proprietor of M/S Gagan Vanaspati Distributors, 11/C, Kalakar Street, Kolkata-700007.
...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
1. The Director, M/S Bansal Oil Mill Ltd.G-834(A), Road. no. 14, Viswakarma Industrial Area, Jaipur-302913, Rajasthan.2. Sri S. K. Agarwal, G-13 & H-14-16, Badhama Industrial Area, Road No. 14, V.K.I. Area, Jaipur-302013, Rajasthan.3. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Division office No. 1, 2nd floor, Amanda Bhawan, S.C. Road. Jaipur-302001, Rajasthan.4. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.Regional Office-4, Lyons Range Kolkata-700001.
...........Respondent(s)
For the Appellant :
Mr. Saraj Kumar Das., Advocate for
For the Respondent :
Dated : 13 Jan 2010
ORDER
HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI A. CHAKRABARTI, PRESIDENT.
1/13.01.2010.
Heard Mr. S. K. Das, the Ld. Advocate for the Complainant – Appellant.The argument of Mr. Das is that the Complainant is the beneficiary of the Insurance Policy as it was the consignee of the subject goods.But it appears from the records that in respect of said goods Insurance Policy was taken by M/s. Bansal Oil Mill Ltd. and O.P. No. 1 representing it made insurance claim in respect of the subject goods and received the Policy benefit.The Complainant in such circumstances, though is a beneficiary as a consignee, cannot maintain a claim from the Insurance Company.The Complainant may have a claim against the O.P. No. 1 and O.P. No. 1 being not a service provider, the complaint before the Forum is not maintainable as the Complainant is not a consumer.But we have not decided any of the questions as regards claim of the Complainant against the O.P. No. 1. if it is otherwise maintainable before any appropriate Court.The appeal is dismissed with the aforesaid observations.
MR. A K RAY, Member
HON'BLE JUSTICE ALOKE CHAKRABARTI, PRESIDENT
MRS. SILPI MAJUMDER, Member
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.