| Complaint Case No. CC/111/2011 | | ( Date of Filing : 19 Jul 2011 ) |
| | | | 1. Smt. Ratnamani Das, aged about 50 years | | W/o. Late Danardan Das, At/ P.O- Udambar, P.S- Remuna, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha | | 2. Manoranjan Das, aged about 25 years | | S/o. Late Danardan Das, At/ P.O- Udambar. P.S- Remuna, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha | | 3. Susil Das, aged about 22 years | | S/o. Late Danardan Das, At/ P.O- Udambar. P.S- Remuna, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha |
| ...........Complainant(s) | |
| Versus | | 1. The Director, Future Generalli India Insurance Company Ltd., Mumbai | | Corporate Office- 001- Trade Plaza, 4/4, Savarkar Road, Prabhadevi, Mumbai- 25. | | Maharashtra | | 2. Zonal Manager, Future Generalli India Insurance Company Ltd., Kalkata Zonal Office | | 501- Avani Signature, 91, A/1 Park Street, Kolkata- 16. | | West Bengal | | 3. Branch Manager, Balasore Bhadrak Central Co Op. Bank Ltd., Remuna Branch | | At/ P.O/ P.S- Remuna, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha | | 4. Secretary, Badapal Co-operative Society, Badapal | | At/ P.O- Badapal, P.S- Remuna, Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha | | 5. Secretary, Balasore Bhadrak Central Co Op. Bank Ltd., Head Office, Balasore | | At/ P.O/ Dist- Balasore. | | Odisha |
| ............Opp.Party(s) |
|
|
| Final Order / Judgement | The case is posted today for further hearing. Advocate for the complainants is absent, no steps filed. Advocates for the O.Ps are also absent, no steps filed. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainants. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up. Perused the case record. In the present case, the O.Ps were appeared & filed their separate w/vs. As it appears from the case record that the complainants remained absent since 24.10.17 to till today except 03.06.19 & 20.01.20, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the nature & conduct of the complainants, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainants should be dismissed. Accordingly, the complaint of the complainants is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed against the O.Ps is treated to be infructuous. | |
