West Bengal

Kolkata-III(South)

CC/430/2017

Sri Tapan Kr. Dey - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Director Alchemist - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. P. Das

21 Dec 2017

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM
KOLKATA UNIT-III(South),West Bengal
18, Judges Court Road, Kolkata 700027
 
Complaint Case No. CC/430/2017
 
1. Sri Tapan Kr. Dey
S/O Lt. Anil Chandra Dey Sarsuna Sonamukhi, Naskar Para 2nd Bye Lane, P.O. & P.S. Sarsuna, Kol-61
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Director Alchemist
15 Ganesh Chandra Avenue, Kol-13
2. ALCHEMIST INFRA REALTY LIMITED
Behala Branch, 93, Diamond Harbour Road,Kolkata-700 008.
3. ALCHEMIST INFRA REALTY LIMITED
411-412,Ansal Tower-38,Nehru Place,New Delhi-110 019.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Satish Kumar Verma PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Balaka Chatterjee MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 21 Dec 2017
Final Order / Judgement

Judgment : Dt.21.12.2017

Shri S. K. Verma, President

            This is a complaint made by one Sri Tapan Kumar Dey, son of Late Anil Chandra Dey, residing at Sarsuna Sonamukhi, Naskar Para 2nd Bye Lane, P.O.- Sarsuna, P.S.-Sarsuna, Kolkata-700 061 against The Director, Alchemist, 15, Ganesh Chandra Avenue, Kolkata-700 013, OP No.1, Alchemist Infra Realty Limited, Behala Branch, 93,Diamond Harbour Road, Kolkata-700 008, OP No.2 and The Alchemist Infra Realty Limited, 723, DLF Tower ‘A’, Jasola, District Centre, New Delhi-110 019, OP No.3,  praying for a direction upon the O.P. to refund Rs.1,00,000/- with interest @ 18% p.a. and also a direction to pay compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- and litigation cost.

            Facts in brief are that Complainant booked a certificate of property of Rs.1,00,000/- with OP on 23.3.2013, which was to mature on 2.3.2016. After maturity Complainant requested the OP to release the total amount of Rs.1,00,000/-. But the OPs avoided it. OPs paid a nominal sum to the Complainant as interest, but did not refund Rs.1,00,000/-. So, Complainant filed this case.

            OPs did not file written version and contest the case and so the case is heard ex-parte.

Decision with reasons

            Complainant filed a petition praying for treating the complaint as affidavit-in-chief.

            Main point for determination is whether Complainant is entitled to the reliefs.

            On perusal of the copy of certificates filed by the Complainant, it appears that he has paid Rs.1,00,000/- to the OP and he used to receive monthly interest.

            In this regard, it also appears that original certificate No.RX00038835 has already been received by OPs. After expiry of the term on 2.3.2016 Complainant requested for refund of Rs.1,00,000/-. But OPs did not oblige.

            Since the allegations of complainant remained unchallenged and unrebutted, we are of the view that Complainant is entitled to refund of Rs.1,00,000/-. So far as compensation and litigation costs are concerned, we do not find justified because Complainant used to receive monthly interest.

Hence,

ordered

           CC/430/2017 and the same is allowed ex-parte in part. OPs are directed to pay Rs.1,00,000/- to the Complainant within two months of this order, in default the amount shall carry interest @ 10% p.a. from the date of this order till realization.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Satish Kumar Verma]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Balaka Chatterjee]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.