Haryana

Karnal

CC/72/2022

Punjab Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Designatory Mahindra And Mahindra Financial Service Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Balraj Pal

07 Aug 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.72 of 2022

                                                          Date of instt.07.02.2022

                                                          Date of Decision:07.08.2023

 

Punjab Singh son of Sh. Kala Singh R/o house no.234, ward no.15, Assandh, District Karnal.

          ...…Complainant.

                                        Versus

The Designatory, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Service Limited, 2nd floor 87-88, Mahila Ashram complex Karnal.

                        ....Opposite party.

  Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Dr. Rekha Chaudhary……..Member.

               

Present:  None for the complainant.

       Sh. Amit Sachdeva, counsel for the OP.

                                         

               Today the case is fixed for evidence of the complainant, subject to the last opportunity. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. It is already 04:00 PM. No wait is justified.

                A careful perusal of the file reveals that in the present complaint, the written version has been filed by the OP on 20.05.2022 and the case was adjourned for evidence of complainant. Thereafter, the complainant has availed several effective opportunities including last opportunity for leading his evidence but the complainant has failed to conclude the same. It appears that the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint.

                Further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified as it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission.

                Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated:07.08.2023.            

                           President,       

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary) 

  Member                Member         

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.