Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/87/2013

Sankar Prasad Pal, aged 34 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Customer Assistance Center (All India), TATA Motors Limited, Thane - Opp.Party(s)

Sj. Niranjan Pradhan & Others

02 Apr 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/87/2013
( Date of Filing : 26 Jun 2013 )
 
1. Sankar Prasad Pal, aged 34 years
S/o. Surendra Nath Pal, At/ P.O- Md Nagar Patana, P.S- Jaleswar, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Customer Assistance Center (All India), TATA Motors Limited, Thane
Teen Hath Naka, Gyan Sadhana, College Service Road, Thane- 400604.
Maharashtra
2. The Area Service Manager, TATA MOTORS Ltd., Bhubaneswar
Area Service Office, N.H-5, Near New Bus Stand, Baramunda, Bhubaneswar- 751003.
Khurda
Odisha
3. The Samal Auto (India) Pvt. Ltd., Balasore
Heary Commercial Vehicle Dealer, N.H-5, Khannagar, Balasore.
Odisha
4. The State Head, Indusind Bank Ltd., Bhubaneswar
No.78, 2nd Floor, Jan Path, Kharabela Nagar, Unit- III, Bhubaneswar- 751001.
Khurda
Odisha
5. The Local Office, Indusind Bank Ltd., Balasore
At- Chidia Polo, Bibekananda Marg, P.S- Town, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
6. The R.T.A, Balasore
At/ P.O- Angaragadia, P.S- Sadar, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 Sri Jayananda Mohanty & Others, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 02 Apr 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case is posted today for further hearing as last chance. Advocate for the complainant is absent, no steps filed. Advocate for the O.P No.3 is present & files hazira. O.Ps No.1, 2, 4, 5 & 6 are also absent, no steps filed. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up. Perused the case record.

                                         In the present case, the O.Ps No.1 to 5 were appeared & filed their separate w/vs. The O.P No.6 was set ex-parte. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 11.10.17 to till today, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the nature & conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed against the O.Ps is treated to be infructuous.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.