Maharashtra

StateCommission

MA/11/520

SHIVANGI SINGH CHAUHAN - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE COUNTRY HEAD PERSONAL FINANCE SERVICE, HSBC - Opp.Party(s)

U B WAVIKAR

25 Jul 2012

ORDER

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/11/520
 
1. SHIVANGI SINGH CHAUHAN
FLAT NO 12SKY HEAVEN BUILDING NEXT TO WILDWOODPARK II VARI ROAD VERSOVA ANDHERI MUMBAI 400061
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA
2. MR PRATAB SINGH
FLAT NO 1, 111/9 SHIVAM APARTMENT KRISHAN GARH VASANT KUNJ
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. THE COUNTRY HEAD PERSONAL FINANCE SERVICE, HSBC
52/60M G ROAD FORT MUMBAI 400001
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA
2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, HSBC BANK
FOUR BUNGLOW ANDHERI WEST MUMBAI
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA
3. THE BRANCH MANAGER HSBC BANK
SOUTH EXT-1 NEW DELHI
NEW DELHI
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode PRESIDING MEMBER
 Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar Member
 
PRESENT:
Adv.Uday Wavikar
......for the Appellant
 
Adv.Sumitha Menon proxy for Adv.Anita Marathe
......for the Respondent
ORDER

ORDER :- (Per Shri S.R.Khanzode, Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member)

 

(1)               Adv.Sumitha Menon files letter of authority given by Mrs.Anita Marathe, advocate on record.  It is taken on record.  Heard both the sides.

 

(2)               There is a delay of 46 days in filing the appeal and hence this application for condonation of delay is made.  Delay is sought to be explained stating that in the meantime the appellant/complainant shifted to new address.  Copy of judgement sent by the District Forum to the previous address was not received by him and he came to know the order passed by the District Forum on 08/11/2011.  Thereafter, he took immediate steps to obtain the copy and file this appeal.  The delay is caused in the process.  The ground of objection is limited to a submission that it was the duty of the applicant/appellant/complainant to intimate the Forum about the change in address and, therefore, that caused should not be considered.  We are afraid that the submission made on behalf of the applicant/appellant is without any merit.  No doubt, there is change of address, but it is not laps for which his doors to get justice by filing appeal should be closed.  Suitable cost can be awarded the purpose payable by the appellant/applicant to the non-applicant/respondent.  Under the circumstances, we find the delay is satisfactorily explained.  Holding accordingly, we pass the following order.

 

ORDER

 

(1)     Misc.Application No.A/11/520 for condonation of delay is allowed subject to cost of 1,000/- payable by the applicant/appellant to the non-applicant/respondent.  Cost be paid within 30 days from today and failing which the appeal shall automatically stand dismissed without making any reference to the Commission.

 

Pronounced on 25th July, 2012.

 

 
 
[Hon'ble Mr. S.R. Khanzode]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.