Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/765/09

THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE CONSUMER GUIDANCE SOCIETY, REP.ALLA KOTESHWARA RAO S/O KONDAIAH - Opp.Party(s)

G.P. FOR STATE

06 Apr 2011

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/765/09
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Krishna at Vijaywada)
 
1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPT.OF ENV.FORESTS, SCIENCE AND TECH.GOVT.OF A.P., FLOOR-2D, BLOCK SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE THE A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

ATHYDERABAD.

 

F.A. 765/2009   

 

Between:

1) 

Dept. of Environment

Forests, Science & Technology

Floor-2D, Block Secretariat

Hyderabad.

 

2) 

Govt. of A.P.

Aranya Bhavan, Saifabad

Hyderabad-4

 

3)  Andhra Pradesh

Rep. by

Krishna Dist.Chilkalopudi, Machilipatnam

 

4) ForestKrishna

Gopala Reddy Road

Suryaraopet,Vijayawada.                                                                                                                         And

The Consumer Guidance Society

Rep. 

S/o. Kondaiah, Retd. Head Master

R/o.

Gonevaram (P.O. & Mandal)

Krishna Dist.                                                                                                

Counsel for the Appellant:                         

Counsel for the Resp:                      Consumer Guidance Society

 

CORAM:

         

&

                                     

 

WEDNESDAY, THIS THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN

 

Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)

 

                                                          

 

1)                     

 

 

2)                            house.                                  

 

3)                        surroundings houses is not true.            

 

there were no trees in and around the tree.           Most of the branches            Right from Section Officer to Forest Range Officer                         

 

4)                 

 

 

 

 

 

5)                     

 

6)                               

7)               

 

 

8)                             causing damage     as well as identity of the complainant.   “I have examined the place and area of the applicant             

9)                        causing damage.     appellants/opposite parties      However, they have enclosed certain proceedings          

10)              Vijayawada         resulting in damage.       28.7.2006.                              

11)                 it was                                  

 

12)                            VijayawadaRajahmundry   Rajahmundry  Hyderabad     the Divisional Forest Officer, Vijaywada        after taking up further inspection/verification     Principal Chief Forest   

13)                 Hyderabad.  The Chief Conservator of    Vijayawada  Hyderabad      

 

14)               any order                             the report of the other.            Hyderabad  it cannot be said that  

 

15)          and accorded permission only just before                          

 

 

 

 

16)               

 

 

1)PRESIDENT 

 

 

2)      MEMBER

             

*pnr

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“UP LOAD – O.K.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
[HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.