Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/108/2014

Laxmidhar Patra, aged about 55 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Concerned Authority, INDUSIND BANK LTD., Consumer Finance Division, Balasore - Opp.Party(s)

Sri Sarat Kumar Rout & others

23 May 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/108/2014
( Date of Filing : 11 Aug 2014 )
 
1. Laxmidhar Patra, aged about 55 years
S/o. Rama Chandra Patra, At- Ganeswarpur, P.O- Januganj, P.S- Industrial, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Concerned Authority, INDUSIND BANK LTD., Consumer Finance Division, Balasore
OCL Branch, F.M Circle, Balasore.
Odisha
2. The Concerned Authority, INDUSIND BANK LTD., Consumer Finance Division, Balasore
1st Floor of Central Bank, Vivekananda Marg, Balasore.
Odisha
3. The Concerned Authority, INDUSIND BANK LTD., Bhubaneswar
No.78, 2nd Floor, Janapath, Kharavela Nagar, Unit-3, Bhubaneswar.
Khordha
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 Sri Keshaba Kumar Acharya, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Sri Keshaba Kumar Acharya, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Sri Keshaba Kumar Acharya, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 23 May 2023
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case record is posted today for hearing. Learned counsel appearing for the Ops files hazira. Neither the learned counsel for the complainant is present nor taken any step. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Thus, the hearing of the case could not be taken up. 

                                         In the present case, Ops were appeared and filed their written version. As it appears from the case record, the complainant remained absent and slept over the matter from 15.01.2019 to 09.03.2022 and from 07.11.2022 till today and no step is taken nor did his advocate take any step on his behalf. From the above nature and conduct of the complainant, it is clearly made out that the complainant has no interest to prosecute his case properly, for which valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the nature and conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.          

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case. The interim order, if any, passed earlier against the Ops shall remain infructuous.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.