Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/10/206

M.K.Sisupalan - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Commissioner, Kerala Fishermen Welfare Fund Board - Opp.Party(s)

Johnson.M.A. Kasaragod

10 Feb 2011

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/10/206
 
1. M.K.Sisupalan
S/o.Kerakutty and Kali, R/atFisheries Colony, Koipady Beach, Po.Kumbala
Kasaragod
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Commissioner, Kerala Fishermen Welfare Fund Board
Thrichur.2
Thrichur
Kerala
2. The Managing Director
Matsyafed, Karuvamkonam
Thiruvananthapuram
Kerala
3. M/s Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd
Elizabeth Alexander Memorial Building, Marine Drive, Cochin.3
Ernakulam
Kerala
4. The Director of Insurance
Kerala State Insurance Department,Thiruvananthapuram
Trivandrum
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONORABLE K.T.Sidhiq PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE P.Ramadevi Member
 
PRESENT:Johnson.M.A. Kasaragod, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
ORDER

                                                                                            Date of filing:  07-10-2010

                                                                                            Date of order 10-02-2011

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                                                 CC.206 /10

                        Dated this, the 10th day of  February 2011

PRESENT

SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ                                             : PRESIDENT

SMT.P. RAMADEVI                                       : MEMBER

 

M.Sisupalan,

S/o.Kerakutty and Kali,

R/at Fisheries Colony Koipady Beach,                                  } Complainant

Po.Kumbala, Kasaragod Taluk & Dist.

(Adv. Johnson.M.A.Kasaragod)

 

1. The Commissioner,                                                                  } Opposite parties

     Kerala Fishermen Welfare Fund Board,

     Trichur.2.

2.  The Managing Director,

      Matsyafed, Karuvamkonam,

     Thiruvananthpuaram.

3. M/s Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd,

    Elizabeth Alexander Memorial Building,

     Marine Drive, Cohin-3.

(Adv. S.Mammu, Taliparamba)

4. The Director of Insurance,

     Kerala State Insurance Department,

     Thiruvananthapuram.

(Govt. Pleader)

   

                                                                        O R D E R

SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ, PRESIDENT

            This is a complaint claiming compensation on account of the accidental death caused to Saradha W/o of the complainant. According to complainant deceased Saradha was a member of Koipady Malsya Thozhilali Kshema Vikasana Sahakarana Sangham.  Therefore Opposite parties 1 & 4 are liable to compensate the complainant.  Complainant’s further case is that the deceased Saradha was also a member of Janata Personal Accident Policy issued by Opposite parties 2 & 3 and therefore they are liable to pay `3,00,000/- as compensation as per the policy.

2.         Version of OP No.1

            The deceased Saradha was a member of Malsya Thozhilali Kshemanidhi and opposite party No.1 insured all registered Fishermen& Allied Workers with United India Insurance Company Thrissur for a period of 7-12-2008 to 6-12-2009 and the compensation amount for death is `1,00,000/- and not `1,50,000/-.  M/s United India Insurance Company has settled the claim and released compensation to the Board and the said amount  is paid to the complainant as per cheque No. 197684  dated 28-7-2010.

3.         Version of OP No.2.

            The deceased Saradha was not a member of Group Personal Accident Scheme facilitated by 2nd opposite party through 3rd opposite party M/s Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd.  Hence they are not liable to pay any compensation.

4.         Opposite party No.3 has not filed any version.

5.         Version of OP No.4.

            The deceased was not insured by Opposite party No.4 during the period 2008-2009.  Hence they are not liable to pay any compensation.

6.         On considering the version, during enquiry complainant admitted that he has received an amount of `1,02,000/- from opposite party No.1 by way of cheque.  But he could not able to produce any document to prove that the deceased Saradha was a member of Group Personal Accident Policy facilitated by opposite parties 3 & 4.  In the light of the above the learned counsel for the complainant fairly conceded that complaint can be disposed of. 

            The complaint is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.

      Sd/-                                                                                                      Sd/-

MEMBER                                                                                                       PRESIDENT

                                                                                    Forwarded by Order

                                                                   SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT

 

Pj/

 

 
 
[HONORABLE K.T.Sidhiq]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONORABLE P.Ramadevi]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.