Date of filing: 07-10-2010
Date of order 10-02-2011
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD
CC.206 /10
Dated this, the 10th day of February 2011
PRESENT
SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ : PRESIDENT
SMT.P. RAMADEVI : MEMBER
M.Sisupalan,
S/o.Kerakutty and Kali,
R/at Fisheries Colony Koipady Beach, } Complainant
Po.Kumbala, Kasaragod Taluk & Dist.
(Adv. Johnson.M.A.Kasaragod)
1. The Commissioner, } Opposite parties
Kerala Fishermen Welfare Fund Board,
Trichur.2.
2. The Managing Director,
Matsyafed, Karuvamkonam,
Thiruvananthpuaram.
3. M/s Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd,
Elizabeth Alexander Memorial Building,
Marine Drive, Cohin-3.
(Adv. S.Mammu, Taliparamba)
4. The Director of Insurance,
Kerala State Insurance Department,
Thiruvananthapuram.
(Govt. Pleader)
O R D E R
SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ, PRESIDENT
This is a complaint claiming compensation on account of the accidental death caused to Saradha W/o of the complainant. According to complainant deceased Saradha was a member of Koipady Malsya Thozhilali Kshema Vikasana Sahakarana Sangham. Therefore Opposite parties 1 & 4 are liable to compensate the complainant. Complainant’s further case is that the deceased Saradha was also a member of Janata Personal Accident Policy issued by Opposite parties 2 & 3 and therefore they are liable to pay `3,00,000/- as compensation as per the policy.
2. Version of OP No.1
The deceased Saradha was a member of Malsya Thozhilali Kshemanidhi and opposite party No.1 insured all registered Fishermen& Allied Workers with United India Insurance Company Thrissur for a period of 7-12-2008 to 6-12-2009 and the compensation amount for death is `1,00,000/- and not `1,50,000/-. M/s United India Insurance Company has settled the claim and released compensation to the Board and the said amount is paid to the complainant as per cheque No. 197684 dated 28-7-2010.
3. Version of OP No.2.
The deceased Saradha was not a member of Group Personal Accident Scheme facilitated by 2nd opposite party through 3rd opposite party M/s Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Hence they are not liable to pay any compensation.
4. Opposite party No.3 has not filed any version.
5. Version of OP No.4.
The deceased was not insured by Opposite party No.4 during the period 2008-2009. Hence they are not liable to pay any compensation.
6. On considering the version, during enquiry complainant admitted that he has received an amount of `1,02,000/- from opposite party No.1 by way of cheque. But he could not able to produce any document to prove that the deceased Saradha was a member of Group Personal Accident Policy facilitated by opposite parties 3 & 4. In the light of the above the learned counsel for the complainant fairly conceded that complaint can be disposed of.
The complaint is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.
Sd/- Sd/-
MEMBER PRESIDENT
Forwarded by Order
SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT
Pj/