Smt.Mandangi Sillo filed a consumer case on 30 Jul 2016 against The Commisioner -cum-Secretary, Rural Development Dept., in the Rayagada Consumer Court. The case no is CC/206/2015 and the judgment uploaded on 25 Oct 2016.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, RAYAGADA
C.C. Case No.206/ 2015
P R E S E N T .
Sri Pradeep Kumar Dash, LL.B, President.
Sri Gadadhara Sahu,B.Sc. Member
Smt.Mandangi Silio,W/o late Mandangi Barika,Ex-Filter Operataor,RWS & S.Division,Rayagada, Residing at Adivasi Street,K.Singpur,Po/Ps K.Singpur,,Dist. Rayagada. …….Complainant
Vrs.
Counsel for the parties:
For the complainant: In Person
For the O.Ps: Sri Y.Madhu,AGP,Rayagada.
JUDGMENT
The facts of the complaint in brief is that the husband of the complainant was appointed as K.Ch.Khalasi in work charged basis on 29.08.1979 and he has given continuous service till his death dt.03.04.1992 ‘and bythat time he was working as Filter Operation under work charged establishment of the OP vide order No.18676 dt.27.11.1989 At the time of his death he has rendered more than twelve years of continuous service without any break and qualified for the pension/ family pension. As per Government Circular Nol.5483/F dt.06.03.1990 and 42790 dt.1,10,1992 it is clearly stated that a Government employee is eligible to get the pensionery benefits after completion of five years service in work charged establishment. The Government has issued direction in letter No.26089 dt.4.06.92 for absorption of the work charged employees of public health engineering organization and as per the official records the late husband of the complainant is coming under the said category and as such entitled to the family pension. Unfortunately the husband of the complainant was expired on 3.4.1992 one day prior to the said notification and on such technical grounds the right of the family pension was ignored/delayed . The necessary pension papers were already submitted to the authorities in the year 2002 and no action was taken by them till today. Hence prayed to direct the Ops to pay the family pension to the complainant and award suitable compensation and such other relief as the forum deem fit and proper. Hence, this complaint.
Being noticed, the O.ps appeared and filed their written version inter alia denying the petition allegations on all its material particulars. It is submitted by OPs that the petitioner is not a consumer and the subject matter of the dispute does not come under the provisions of the C.P.Act,1986. The Ops are neither trader nor service provides and that the petitioner is also not a consumer within the meaning and ambit of the C.P.Act.
It is further submitted by the Ops that the husband of the complainant was appointed as work charged khalasi on 29.08.1979 under Executive Engineer,P.H.Division, Koraput and was promoted to the post of filter operation under work charged establishment and he joined in the said post on 1.1.1990 and the appointment and service of the husband of the complainant was purely temporary and he was died on 3.4.92 while in he was in service and he rendered more than twelve and half years of continues service in the work charged establishment without any interruption. The Chief Engineer, PH Odisha, Bhubaneswar has communicated vide letter No.126476 dt.7.8.92 to absorb all work charged employees to Brought over regularization with effect from 4.6.1992 and accordingly the services of all the work charged employees were regularized but unfortunately the services of the husband of the complainant could not be regularized since he was died on 3.4.1992 while in service, prior to the order of the government as such the service of Mandangi Barika was not regularized and he died as temporary work charged employee as such he was devoid of service benefits including family pension. The husband of the complainant was not a regular government employee and as such the pension benefits is not applicable to him. As sympathetic consideration, the Superintending Engineer, RWS&S ,Koraput has submitted a proposal to the Chief Engineer, RWS&S Odisha, Bhubaneswar to move the matter to H&UD Department, Government of Odisha for sanction of work charged post of filter operation with effect from 3.4.92 i.e. from the date of death of Mandangi Barika instead of 4.6.92 and the Chief Engineer, RWS&S ,Bhubaneswar has forwarded the same to the Joint Secretary, Government Rural Development Department, Odisha, Bhubaneswar but since the proposal is beyond the frame work of Rules the same could not considered by the Government. The complainant has no cause of action to file this petition and she came with this petition at a belated stage after 23 years as such this petition is barred by limitation, bad under the law and it not maintainable and hence prayed to dismiss the case .
FINDINGS
We perused the complaint petition and written version filed by both the parties and after perusal of documents it reveals that the complaint petition relates to the year 1992 which is a time barred complaint and this forum can not adjudicate this complaint. As per Section 24 A of the Consumer Protection Act : (l) The District Forum, shall not admit a complaint unless it is filed within two years from the date on which the cause of action has arisen.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), a complaint may be entertained after the period specified in sub-section (l), if the complainant satisfies the District Forum, the State Commission or the National Commission, as the case may be, that he had sufficient cause for not filing the complaint within such period:
Provided that no such complaint shall be entertained unless the National Commission, the State Commission or the District Forum, as the case may be, records its reasons for condoning such delay. Hence, the complaint petition is dismissed having barred by law of limitation
ORDER
Hence, in view of the Sec.24 A of the C.P.Act,1986 the complaint petition filed by the complainant is dismissed having no merit. As well as the case related to service matter. Hence, the complaint is directed to approach the appropriate forum.
Pronounced in open forum today on this 21st day of October,2016 under the seal and signature of this forum.
A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements , be forwarded to the parties free of charge.
Member President
Documents relied upon:
By the complainant:
By the Opp.Party: Nil
President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.