Orissa

Rayagada

CC/120/2016

Smt. Sundansu Bala Padhi - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Chier Manager, State Bank of India - Opp.Party(s)

Self

25 Nov 2020

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM

RAYAGADA,,STATE:  ODISHA.

…

C.C. Case  No. 120 / 2016.                                       Date.   25  .11. 2020.

P R E S E N T .

Sri  Gadadhara   Sahu,                                                                    President-In-Charge

Smt. Padmalaya   Mishra,                                                             Member.

 

Smt Sudhansu Bala  Padhi,  Brahmin Street,  Po/Dist: Rayagada,State: Odisha,                                                                                          ….                    Complainant.

            Versus.

            1.The Chief Manager,  State Bank of India, Main Branch, Rayagada.

            2.The Regional   Manager, State Bank of India,  Rayagada.

            3.The Chief General  Manager, State Bank of India, Jawaharlal Marg,Bhubaneswar.

….                    Opposite parties.

 

For the complainant:- Self.

For the  O.Ps. :- Sri N.N.Panda, Advocate, Rayagada.

                                                                                JUDGEMENT

The  curx of the case is that  the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps    for  freeze the S.B account No. 11038999494 of the complainant  for non payment outstanding  loan amount to the O.Ps towards personal loan  availed by the complainant  Rs.1,00,000/- and to withdraw all the penal interest   in relation to personal   loan account No.30572538737  for which  the complainant  sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.

Upon  Notice, the O.Ps put in their appearance and filed joint written version through their learned counsel in which  they refuting allegation made against them.  The O.Ps  taking one and another pleas in the written version   sought to dismiss the complaint as it is not maintainable  under the C.P. Act, 1986. The facts which are not specifically admitted may be treated  as denial of the O.Ps. Hence the O.Ps  prays the forum to dismiss the case against  them  to meet the ends of justice.

During the course of hearing the  learned counsel for the O.Ps filed a memo  submitted that  the complainant  has paid  all the dues towards the personal  loan account No. 30572538737 to the bank   in turn the bank also has issued  No dues certificate  in favour of the complainant  towards the   personal  loan by the O.Ps to subside the  present dispute between the complainant & O.Ps  with full and final  satisfaction  of  the complaint and provide proper service  and no claim further  against them from the complainant as the dispute solved  among themselves. Hence the O.P. prays the forum to dispose the case accordingly  as settled out of the court.

Heard from the parties. During the course of hearing the complainant has not objected the memo filed by  the O.P.  Perused  the   record  and  memo  filed by the O.P.  The memo is allowed.

                Accordingly the present dispute mitigated  and the  case stands disposed  off  but O.Ps wriggled out of  liabilities & the  case closed against  them    as  the  complainant   do not want to  proceed  with  the case further against the O.Ps  after settled the matter amicably out of court.  .  Parties are left  to bear their own cost.

Dictated and corrected by me.     

 Pronounced on this      25^th.    Day of       November, 2020.

               

                                                                                Member.                                      President