Orissa

Ganjam

CC/11/2016

Sri Sachidananda Padhi - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Chief Personnel, LLOYD Electric & Engineering Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Through Sri B.K.Padhy, Advocate & Associates for the Complainant

11 Sep 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, GANJAM, BERHAMPUR.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/11/2016
( Date of Filing : 27 Jan 2016 )
 
1. Sri Sachidananda Padhi
S/o. Sri Sadhu Charan Padhi, Res At. Purusottam Nagar, 3rd Lane, House No. 118, P.S. B. N. Pur, Berhampur 760010, Ganjam.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Chief Personnel, LLOYD Electric & Engineering Ltd.,
Plot No 2, Industrial Area, Kalkaji, New Delhi 110019. Corporate Office at. LLOYD Electric & Engineering Ltd., 159, Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase III, New Delhi 110020.
2. The Proprietor, M/s. Aryabhatt Doordarshan,
One way Traffic Road, Berhampur, Dist. Ganjam 760001.
3. The Manager / Head,
LLOYD Electric & Engineering Service Centre, At. Brahma Nagar, 1st Lane, P.O. Berhampur, P.S. B. N. Pur, Dist. Ganjam.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Satish Kumar Panigrahi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Saritri Pattanaik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Through Sri B.K.Padhy, Advocate & Associates for the Complainant, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Through Sri Kailash Chandra Mishra Advocate for the Opp. Parties, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 11 Sep 2023
Final Order / Judgement

 

DATE OF HEARING: 11.09.2023

                                                DATE OF DISPOSAL: 11.09.2023

 

 

PER:   SRI SATISH KUMAR PANIGRAHI, PRESIDENT

 

            Both parties are found absent today on repeated call and they have not taken any steps also today.

On perusal of case record it is apparent that, the Complainant has filed this case for deficiency in services rendered by the Opposite Parties. Accordingly the case was admitted on 18.02.2016 by the Commission and notice was also issued to the Ops on the 18.02.2016. On perusal of record it is manifest that the complainant is found absent since 11.07.2018 till today and not taken any steps in any point of time. The complainant probably does not want to proceed in this case any further. In view of above circumstances, the Commission feels to dispose of the case of the complaint.

Hence in the result, the present consumer complaint stands dismissed for non prosecution by the Complainant. No order as to cost.

This case is disposed of accordingly.

The Judgment be uploaded on the www.confonet.nic.in for the perusal of the parties.

A certified copy of this Judgment be provided to all the parties free of cost as mandated by the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 or they may download same from the www.confonet.nic.in to treat the same as if copy of the order received from this Commission.

The file is to be consigned to the record room along with a copy of this Judgment.

 

 

Pronounced on 11.09.2023.

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Satish Kumar Panigrahi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Saritri Pattanaik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.