Tamil Nadu

Viluppuram

CC/79/2023

Dhanancheziyan No.1/287, Perumal Koil Street, Veerashozhapuram Village, Kandachipuram Taluk - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Chief Manager/ The Authorised Signatory, ICICI Bank Ltd., Head Office, Chennai and another - Opp.Party(s)

Mr.M. Muralitharan

22 Apr 2024

ORDER

Date of filing     :   28.11.2023

                                                                                                Date of Order    :   22.04.2024

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

VILLUPURAM.

Present:    Thiru.D.SATHISH KUMAR, M.A., B.L.,                  :  PRESIDENT.

                                                               Tmt.  K.AMALA, M.A., LL.B., PGDCLP.,              MEMBER.II

                                                                        CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO :79/ 2023

MONDAY, THE 22nd  DAY OF APRIL 2024.

    Dhanancheziyan

S/o Rathakrishnan,

No.1/287, Perumal Koil Street,

Veerashozhapuram Village,

Kandachipuram Taluk,

Villpuram     District 

                                                                                                                                                                          …….Complainant                                                                                                                                                                                                               

            -Vs-

  1. The Chief Manager (Law),

ICICI Bank Ltd., Head Office,

ICICI Towers, 2nd Floor, Plot No.24,

   South Phrase, Ambattur Industrial Estate,

Chennai – 600 058.

 

  1. The Branch Manager,

ICICI Bank Ltd., Villupuram Branch Office,

No.792, East Pondy Road, Thiru Vi Ka Street,

Villupuram District – 605 602                                                                                                                        ……Opposite Parties

 

 

Counsel for Complainant                              :  Mr. M. Muralitharan

Counsel for 1st and 2nd Opposite parties      :  Mr. K. Sankar

FINAL ORDER

Pronounced by:

  Thiru. D. SATHISH KUMAR, M.A., B.L., PRESIDENT (OPEN COMMISSION)

 

          Complainant and his counsel are present. Opposite Parties 1 and 2 side counsel also present. Complainant side filed withdrawn memo with liberty to file complaint as fresh. Further Complainant counsel’s oral submission also heard. In the memo Opposite Parties 1 & 2 counsel made endorsement that he had taken notice and seeking reasonable cost. Hence withdrawn memo perused and recorded. Therefore the complaint is dismissed with liberty to the complainant to file complaint as fresh with imposed reasonable cost sum of Rs.1000/- paid to the Opposite Parties 1 and 2 counsel Withdrawn memo shall be part of this order.              

Pronounced in the open commission, on this the 22nd  day of April 2024.

Sd/-

 

Sd/-

MEMBER.II

 

PRESIDENT.

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.