Kerala

Kollam

CC/244/2018

Midhun Safar, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Chief Executive Officer, - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.THOMAS JOHN MORRIS.

26 Oct 2021

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Civil Station , Kollam-691013.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/244/2018
( Date of Filing : 07 Nov 2018 )
 
1. Midhun Safar,
Chittadeswaram,Purayidom,Andamukkam,Kollam,Kerala.
2. M.Sajeer,
'Grace',Golden Nagar,Parvathipuram,Nagarcovil,K.K.Dist,Tamil Nadu.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Chief Executive Officer,
Inter Globe Aviation Ltd(Indigo),Global Business Park, Gurgaon,Haryana-122001.
2. The Marketing Head,
Inter Globe Aviation Ltd(Indigo),Global Business Park, Gurgaon,Haryana-122001.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 26 Oct 2021
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLLAM

DATED THIS THE 26th DAY OF OCTOBER 2021

Present: -        Sri.E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim, B.A, LLM. President

            Smt.S.Sandhya   Rani. Bsc, LLB ,Member

            Sri.Stanly Harold, B.A.LLB, Member

CC.No.244/2018

  1. Midhun Safar,

         Chittadeswaram,

   Purayidom, Andamukkam,

   Kollam, Kerala.

(By Adv.Thomas John Morris)

  1. M.Sajeer, “Grace”, Golden Nagar,                   

            Parvathipuram, Nagarcovil,                                   :           Complainants

     K.K.Dist; Tamil Nadu.

   (By Adv.Thomas John Morris)

V/s

  1. The Chief Executive Officer,

Inter Globe Aviation Ltd.(Indigo),

Global Business Park,

      Gurgaon, Haryana-122001.                                           :          Opposite parties

(By Adv.B.B.Shanavas)

  1. The Marketing Head

Inter Globe Aviation Ltd.(Indigo),

Global Business Park,

Gurgaon, Haryana-122001.

(By Adv.B.B.Shanavas)

ORDER

Sri. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM , B.A, LLM,President

          Complainant absent counsel for the complainant is also absent.  One Junior advocate prays for time to adduce evidence.  Opposite party represented.  In spite of specific direction to the complainant to appear and adduce evidence the complainant has not been turning up and adducing evidence.  Hence we are of the view that the complainant has no interest in proceeding with the case. 

          In the result complaint stands dismissed for default.

          No costs.

Dated this the 26th dayof October 2021.

                                                                                       E.M .MUHAMMED IBRAHIM:Sd/-

                                                                                       S.SANDHYA RANI:Sd/-

                                                                                      STANLY HAROLD:Sd/-   

                                                                                       Forwarded/by Order

                                                                                      Senior superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. STANLY HAROLD]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.