Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

CC/04/2017

G.Karthikeyan s/o.A.Ganesan - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Chief Executive Mirc Electronics Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

A.Arun Kumar

21 Mar 2018

ORDER

                                                                            Complaint presented on:  22.11.2016

                                                                               Order pronounced on:  21.03.2018

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (NORTH)

    2^nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

       PRESENT: THIRU.K.JAYABALAN, B.Sc., B.L.,         PRESIDENT

                    THIRU. M.UYIRROLI KANNAN B.B.A., B.L.,      MEMBER - I

                        WEDNESDAY THE 21^st  DAY OF MARCH 2018

 

                                          C.C.NO.04/2017

 

 

G.Karthikeyan (M/Aged 28 yrs),

S/o.A.Ganesan,

No.19/9 Chairman Agencies,

J.J.Khan Road,

Royapettah, Chennai – 600 014.

 

                                                                                          ..... Complainant

 

                                     ..Vs..

The Chief Executive,

Mirc Electronics Ltd.,

No.18, 4^th Lane, 1^st Floor,

Nungambakkam High Road,

Chennai – 600 034.

                                                                             …..Opposite party

 

         

Date of complaint                                      : 09.01.2017

Counsel for complainant                 :M/S. A.Arunkumar, B.Karthikeyanr

 

Counsel for Opposite Party            : Represented by Mr.A.Suresh Authorized

                                                          Agent of the opposite party  

 

 

 

O R D E R

 

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. K.JAYABALAN B.Sc., B.L.,

This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.

No representation for  the Complainant. The complaint was posted for filing the proof affidavit of the complainant for 13 hearings  from 16.03.2017 to 07.03.2018.  He has not filed the same. Lastly the case adjourned  from 07.03.2018 hearing to today (21.03.2018) as last chance to file the proof affidavit of the complainant. However, there was no representation on behalf of the complainant till 04.00 p.m and also not filed his proof affidavit. The complainant is also called absent.

          The attitude of the complainant  in  not filing  the proof affidavit  by him above shows that he has no interest in prosecuting the complaint. Hence the complaint is dismissed for default. No costs.   

                 Pronounced by us on this 21^st  day of March 2018.

 

      -sd-                                                                                 -sd-     

MEMBER – I                                                                PRESIDENT