View 7531 Cases Against Electricity
Dinesh Singh filed a consumer case on 22 Nov 2023 against The Chief Engineer, Chandigarh Electricity Department in the DF-I Consumer Court. The case no is CC/538/2020 and the judgment uploaded on 28 Nov 2023.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-I,
U.T. CHANDIGARH
Consumer Complaint No. | : | CC/538/2020 |
Date of Institution | : | 25.11.2020 |
Date of Decision | : | 22/11/2023 |
Dinesh Singh S/o Sh. Tulsi Ram R/o H. No.2280, Site & service Complex Dadumajra Colony, Chandigarh.
… Complainant
V E R S U S
. … Opposite Parties
CORAM : | PAWANJIT SINGH | PRESIDENT |
| SURJEET KAUR SURESH KUMAR SARDANA | MEMBER MEMBER
|
ARGUED BY |
| Complainant in person. |
|
| Sh. Sachin, ADA for OPs alongwith Sh. Virender Kumar, Revenue Accountant O/o OP No.2. |
|
|
|
Briefly stated the electricity meter of OPs is installed in the premises of the complainant and the complainant is paying the electricity bill regularly as is apparent from online receipt Exhibit C-2. However, on 31.7.2020 the complainant was shocked to see when he received a huge bill of Rs.12993/- and the complainant immediately approached OP No.2 and complained about the huge amount of bill but the OP No.2 made excuse that there would be earthing of electricity due to which the electricity meter is running fast and the department will sent the official to check the meter and next time the bill would be raised on actual basis and as such the complainant paid the said bill to avoid any litigation. However, again in the month of October 2020 the complainant received a bill of Rs.15889/- The complainant again approached the OP No.2 and made a complaint dated 21.10.2020 requesting the OP No.2 to change the meter as the existing meter is running even after switching off the main switch. On receipt of complaint the official of Ops visited the premises of the complainant and pulled out the electricity supply from the said meter but even then the meter was running. The official of the OPs asked the complainant to apply for change of meter by paying Rs.200/- and accordingly the complainant requested the OPs for change of the meter but nothing concrete was done by them. It is alleged that due to the aforesaid act of the OPs the complainant has paid an amount of Rs.50,000/- in the shape of bills on account of defaulted meter. Alleging the aforesaid act of Opposite Parties deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on their part, this complaint has been filed
“7.12 In case of defective/stuck/stopped/burnt meter, the consumer shall be billed on the basis of average consumption corresponding to the three billing cycles of the previous year wherein the meter was functional. These charges shall be leviable for a maximum period of three months only during which time the licensee is expected to have replaced the defective meter.”
|
|
| sd/- [Pawanjit Singh] |
|
|
| President |
|
|
| Sd/- |
|
|
| [Surjeet Kaur] Member Sd/-
|
22/11/2023 |
|
| [Suresh Kumar Sardana] |
mp |
|
| Member
|
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.