Kerala

Ernakulam

CC/12/178

AMBOTTI K ABRAHAM - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE CHEIF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

13 May 2013

ORDER

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
ERNAKULAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/12/178
 
1. AMBOTTI K ABRAHAM
KUNNUMPURATHU HOUSE, KOLENCHERY P.O., ERNAKULAM, 682 311
ERNAKULAM
KERALA
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. THE CHEIF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LTD.
A BLOCK, 2ND FLOOR, DAKC, KOPAR KHAIRANE, NAVI MUMBAI, 400710 HAVING ITS OFFICE AT A&P ARCADE, SAHODARAN AYYAPPAN ROAD, KOCHI 682 016
MAHARASHTRA
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONORABLE MR. A.RAJESH PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

 

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,

ERNAKULAM.

Date of filing : 21/03/2012

Date of Order : 13/05/2012

Present :-

Shri. A. Rajesh, President.

 

    C.C. No. 178/2012

    Between

 

Ambotti K. Abraham,

::

Complainant

Kunnumpurath House,

Kolencherry. P.O.,

Ernakulam – 682 311.


 

(By Adv. Bimala Baby,

Room No. 201, Aiswarya Nagar,Thaikkattukara,

Aluva – 683 106.)


 

And


 

The Chief Executive Officer, Reliance Communications Ltd.,

::

Opposite Party

A block, 2nd Floor, DAKC,

Kopar Khairane, Navi Mumbai – 400 710, its office at A & P Arcade, Sahodaran Ayyappan Road, Kochi – 682 016.


 

(By Adv. George Cherian, Karippaparambil

Associates Advocates,

H.B. 48,

Panampilly Nagar,

Cochin - 36)


 

O R D E R

A. Rajesh, President.


 

1. The opposite party in their version has stated that the complaint is barred by limitation, since the cause of action for the complaint arose in 2006.

 

2. Heard the counsel for the parties and went through the documents on record. Admittedly, the impugned quiz competition was held from 19th November to 31st December 2006. The complainant caused an


 

e-mail communication dated 17-03-2007 to the opposite party highlighting his grievances. Thereafter, there was no response on either side till 26-08-2010. On 26-08-2010, again the complainant issued a communication to the opposite party to which the opposite party replied on 27-08-2010.


 

3. By the time, the limitation period as prescribed under Section 24 A of the Consumer Protection Act is already over. The complainant opted to file this complaint only on 23-03-2012, which is belated and barred by limitation. This Forum is only to dismiss the complaint, for reasons stated. Held so.


 

Pronounced in open Forum on this the 13th day of May 2013

 


 

Sd/- A. Rajesh, President.

 

Forwarded/By Order,


 


 


 

Senior Superintendent.


 


 

 
 
[HONORABLE MR. A.RAJESH]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.