Tamil Nadu

Thiruvallur

EA/3/2015

D.Thiruvateeswaran - Complainant(s)

Versus

The cheif Executive Officer, Central Govt. Employees Welfare Housing Organisation - Opp.Party(s)

Party in Person

03 Feb 2016

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
THIRUVALLUR
No.1-D, C.V.NAIDU SALAI, 1st CROSS STREET,
THIRUVALLUR-602 001
 
Execution Application No. EA/3/2015
In
Complaint Case No. CC/10/40
 
1. D.Thiruvateeswaran
L13A, Servamangala Colony,Ashok Nagar,Chennai-83
Chennai
Tamilnadu
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. The cheif Executive Officer, Central Govt. Employees Welfare Housing Organisation
6th Floor, 'A' Wing, Janpath Bhavan, New Delhi-110 001
New Delhi
New Delhi
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  THIRU.S.PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M., PRESIDENT
  Tmt.S.Sujatha, B.Sc., MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Party in Person, Advocate
For the Respondent: -, Advocate
ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, THIRUVALLUR – 1.

 

PRESENT:   THIRU.  S.  PANDIAN,  B.Sc., L.L.M.,        -    PRESIDENT

                      TMT.  S.  SUJATHA,  B.Sc.,                      -    MEMBER - I                                    

E.A. No.03/2015

in

C.C. No.40/2010

(Wednesday the 03th day of February 2016)

 

D. Thiruvateeswaran,

L 13 A, Sarvamangala Colony,

Ashok Nagar,

Chennai - 600 083.                                             … Petitioner / Decree Holder.

 

-Versus -

 

The Chief Executive Officer,

Central Government Employees’

Welfare Housing Organisation,

6th Floor, A Wing,

Janpath Bhawan,

New Delhi - 110 001.                               … Opposite party / Judgment Debtor.

 

Counsel for the Petitioner / Decree Holder          :  Party - in - Person

Counsel for the Opposite party / Judgment Debtor     :   -

 

                                                                     

 

ORDER

PRONOUNCED BY THIRU. S. PANDIAN, PRESIDENT

           

Steps not filed.  Petitioner / Decree Holder is called absent.  No other representation.   However, passed it over.

 

At 12:05 P.M.

Petitioner / Decree Holder is again called absent.  No other representation.  In spite of specific instruction to the Petitioner / Decree Holder for taking steps against the Judgment Debtor / Opposite party, the Decree Holder / Petitioner has not yet come forward to take any steps against Judgment Debtor / Opposite party, though sufficient time is given.  Moreover, the petitioner is called absent continuously for the past five Hearings.  Therefore, there is no valid reason to prolong further and it clearly shows the disinterest of the Judgment Debtor / Complainant. 

 

Hence, the E.A. is Dismissed for Default.   No cost.

 

Sd/-***                                                                                                            Sd/-***

MEMBER  I                                                                                                    PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[ THIRU.S.PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M.,]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Tmt.S.Sujatha, B.Sc.,]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.