The Cheif Ecexutive Officer V/S N.V.Keshava Murthy - Consumer Court Case

Karnataka

Kolar

CC/07/73

N.V.Keshava Murthy - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Cheif Ecexutive Officer - Opp.Party(s)

Pavana Chandra Shetty

20 May 2008

ORDER

THE DISTRICT CONSUMAR DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
No.419, Ist Floor,. H.N. Gowda Building, M.B.Road, Kolar-563101
consumer case(CC) No. CC/07/73

N.V.Keshava Murthy						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
The Cheif Ecexutive Officer						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

This complaint was filed for recovery of deposit made by complainant with opposite party with interest. The opposite party admitted the receipt of deposit but contended that the interest has been paid up to 31.03.2005. The parties filed documents and opposite party produced account books maintained by it during argument. The case was being adjourned for verification of account. In the meanwhile the opposite party filed memo on 20.05.2008 stating that an amount of Rs.1,80,000/- has been paid on 19.05.2008 to complainant in full settlement of the claim made in the complaint. The voucher shown to have executed by complainant is produced. The counsel for complainant took time to verify the execution of payment voucher by complainant. Today the learned counsel for complainant submitted he could not contact his party and further order may be passed. We perused the admitted signatures and signature found on the discharge voucher dated 19.05.2008. We are satisfied that this voucher has been executed by complainant. The secretary of complainant who is present before the Forum submitted that he was present at the time of settlement and payment of amount and at the time of execution of voucher by complainant. Hence we pass the following ORDER The complaint is dismissed. Parties to bear their own costs.

This complaint was filed for recovery of deposit made by complainant with opposite party with interest. The opposite party admitted the receipt of deposit but contended that the interest has been paid up to 31.03.2005. The parties filed documents and opposite party produced account books maintained by it during argument. The case was being adjourned for verification of account. In the meanwhile the opposite party filed memo on 20.05.2008 stating that an amount of Rs.1,80,000/- has been paid on 19.05.2008 to complainant in full settlement of the claim made in the complaint. The voucher shown to have executed by complainant is produced. The counsel for complainant took time to verify the execution of payment voucher by complainant. Today the learned counsel for complainant submitted he could not contact his party and further order may be passed. We perused the admitted signatures and signature found on the discharge voucher dated 19.05.2008. We are satisfied that this voucher has been executed by complainant. The secretary of complainant who is present before the Forum submitted that he was present at the time of settlement and payment of amount and at the time of execution of voucher by complainant. Hence we pass the following ORDER The complaint is dismissed. Parties to bear their own costs.