Chandigarh

DF-I

MA/38/2012

Brijinder - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Chandigarh Housing Board - Opp.Party(s)

30 Mar 2012

ORDER


Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarh
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 38 of 2012
1. Brijinder ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. The Chandigarh Housing Board Chandigarh Sector-9, through its Chairmanb ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 30 Mar 2012
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Misc. Application No.38 of 2012 in

Revision Petition No.14 of 2011

in

Execution Application No.77 of 2010

Consumer Complaint No.474 of 2002

 

Brijinder               Vs.              The Chandigarh Housing Board

 

PRESENT:

Sh.Ram Sarup Dhanda, Counsel for Applicant-Complainant.

Sh.Vikas Jain, Counsel for Respondent.

 

Dated the 30th day of March, 2012

ORDER

            The respondent had made Misc.Application No.63 of 2012 stating therein that the Chandigarh Housing Board is complying with the impugned order without prejudice to its right to file revision petition before the Hon’ble National Commission and SLP before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. It has been further stated that the Chandigarh Housing Board also reserves its right to recover the excessive amount paid to the allottees. The said submission made in the application is premature and will be considered if there is any order passed either by the Hon’bel National Commission or by the Hon’ble Apex Court. The bankers cheque of Rs.8500/- (No.793401 dated 28.3.2012 favouring Sh.Brijinder drawn on State Bank of India) has been handed over to the counsel for applicant-complainant. Photocopy of cheque in question in token of receipt retained on record. The Misc.Application No.63 of 2012 of respondent stands disposed of accordingly.

            Counsel for applicant-complainant made statement that he received payment being satisfied but without any condition and withdrawn the petition. Such statement has been recorded on the application itself. In view of this, the application is dismissed as withdrawn.

            Certified copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. Be tagged with the main file.

                                                                                                Sd/-

                                                                   PRESIDING OFFICER                                                                      LOK ADALAT

          Sd/-                               Sd/-                               Sd/-

3rd Member                  2nd MEMBER               1st MEMBER

 


MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, MEMBERHONABLE MR. P. D. Goel, PRESIDENT DR. MRS MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA, MEMBER