Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

FA/845/2011

M.Krishna Rao S/o M.Godavari, 58 yrs., Occ: Rtd., Bank Manager, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The chancellor, Institute of Chargered Fin. Analysist of India, India University - Opp.Party(s)

M/s V.Chaitanya latha

29 Oct 2012

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/845/2011
(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. cc/24/2009 of District Hyderabad-II)
 
1. M.Krishna Rao S/o M.Godavari, 58 yrs., Occ: Rtd., Bank Manager,
48-7-47, First floor, Srinagar, Ramatalkies side market road, Visakapatnam
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. The chancellor, Institute of Chargered Fin. Analysist of India, India University
52, Nagarjuna hills, Hyderbaad
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA PRESIDING MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD

 

F.A.No.845 OF 2011 AGAINST C.C.NO.24 OF 2009 DISTRICT FORUM-II HYDERABAD

 

Between:

  Side Market Road,                                                                 

               

 

The Chancellor
Institute of Chartered Financial University, 52,

Respondents/opposite party

 

 

Counsel for the Appellant        Counsel for the Respondent     

 

         QUORUM:  

                       SRI THOTA ASHOK KUMAR, HON’BLE MEMBER

 

MONDAY THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER

  

 

Oral Order (As per Sri                                               1.    `10,000/- towards compensation and`5,000/- towards costs, the complainant has filed appeal contending that the District Forum ought to have considered the number of years wasted by him on account of promise made by the respondent-institute and it should have awarded

2.             

3.            

4.            

5.            

6.            

7.            

8.            `10,000/- towards compensation and`5,000/- towards costs. For enhancement of the compensation, the appellant would show the only cause that the respondent had not issued diploma co-signed by

9.            

10.            

11.              

12.           `10,000/- equivalent to the amount paid by the appellant towards fee would meet the ends of justice.

13.           

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           KMK*

 
 
 
 
 
 
[HONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA]
PRESIDING MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.