Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

129/2014

P.R.Thanigaivelu, - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Chairman,Tamilnadu Electricity Board, - Opp.Party(s)

J.Miltan Arul

15 Sep 2016

ORDER

 

 

                                                                            Complaint presented on:  02.07.2014

                                                                                Order pronounced on:  26.09.2016

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (NORTH)

    2^nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

PRESENT: THIRU.K.JAYABALAN, B.Sc., B.L.,        PRESIDENT

                    TMT.T.KALAIYARASI, B.A.B.L.:           MEMBER II

 

MONDAY THE 26^th    DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2016

 

                                       C.C.NO.129/2014

 

P.R.Thanigaivelu,

S/o.P.M.Ramalingam,

Proprietor,

Hotel Shree Raj Bhavan,

No.87, Madhavaram High Road,

Sembium, Chennai – 600 011.

                                                                                ..... Complainant

 

                                     ..Vs..

1.The Chairman,

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,

Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

 

2.The Executive Engineer,

O & M, Perambur,

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,

No.75, Paper Mills Road,

Chennai – 600 011.

 

3.The Assistant Engineer,

O & M, Perambur,

Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,

Sembiam, Chennai – 600 011.

 

                                                                  …..Opposite parties

 

Date of complaint                                            : 10.07.2014

Counsel for complainant                       : J.Milton Arul Rajendran

 

Counsel for Opposite Parties                 : R.Amernath Rao Khande

 

O R D E R

 

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. K.JAYABALAN B.Sc., B.L.,

This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.

Counsel for Opposite Party  present.  No representation for Complainant till 12.10 p.m. Proof Affidavit of Complainant not filed inspite of  posted today as last chance. Complainant also called absent. Hence  the Complaint is dismissed for non filing of proof affidavit and the Complainant has no interest in prosecuting the Complaint. Hence the Complaint is dismissed for default. No costs.

 Pronounced by us on this 26^th  day of September 2016.

 

      -sd-                                                                                 -sd-     

MEMBER – II                                                              PRESIDENT       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

o:p>