Complaint Case No. CC/14/341 |
| | 1. SRI GOBINDA DEY | S/O lt. Sital Dey, Vill Kharsarai (Madhyampara) P.o. Kharsarai, | Hooghly 712304 |
| ...........Complainant(s) | |
Versus | 1. The Chairman & Managing Director, Weird Industries Ltd. | Bhagyalaxmi Building, Dasnagar, Howrah 711 105 | 2. Mr. Chand Mohan Ghosh, Director, Weird Industries Ltd. | Bhagyalaxmi Building, Dasnagar, Howrah 711 105 | 3. Gopal Dalapati, Director, Weird Industries Ltd. | Bhagyalaxmi Building, Dasnagar, Howrah 711 105 | 4. The Chairman & Managing Director, Weird Infrastructure Corporation Ltd. | 34C/24, Nawab Yusuf Road, Civil Lines, Allahabad - 211 001 U.P. |
| ............Opp.Party(s) |
|
|
ORDER | DATE OF FILING : 19-06-2014. DATE OF S/R : 22-07-2014. DATE OF FINAL ORDER : 05-02-2015. Sri Gobinda Dey, son of late Sital Dey, village Kharsarai ( Madhyampara ), P.O. Kharsarai, District Hooghly, PIN 712304.
2 Sumita Dey, wife of Gobinda Dey, village Kharsarai ( Madhyampara ), P.O. Kharsarai, District Hooghly, PIN 712304. - Rakesh Dey,
son of Gobinda Dey, village Kharsarai ( Madhyampara ), P.O. Kharsarai, District Hooghly, PIN 712304. - Banamali Kundu,
son of late Kalipada Kundu, village Kharsarai ( Madhyampara ), P.O. Kharsarai, District Hooghly, PIN 712304. - Rash Behari Sen,
son of late Balai Chandra Sen, village Kharsarai ( Madhyampara ), P.O. Kharsarai, District Hooghly, PIN 712304…………………………………………………... COMPLAINANTS. Versus - 1. The Chairman & Managing Director, Weird Industris Ltd., Bhagyalaxmi Building, Dasnagar, Howrah 711105. 2. Mr. Chand Mohan Ghosh, Director, Weird Industries Ltd., Bhagyalaxmi Building, Dasnagar, Howrah 711105. 3. Gopal Dalapati, Director, Weird Industries Ltd., Bhagyalaxmi Building, Dasnagar, Howrah 711105. 4. The Chairman & Managing Director, Weird Infrastructure Corporation Ltd., 34C/24, Nawab Yusuf Road, Civil Lines, Allahabad, U.P. PIN 211001. ……………………………………….............OPPOSITE PARTIES. P R E S E N T President : Shri T.K. Bhattacharya, M.A. LL.B. WBHJS. Member : Smt. Jhumki Saha. Member : Shri Subrata Sarker. F I N A L O R D E R - Complainant, five in numbers ,by filing a petition U/S 12 of the C .P. Act, 1986 ( as amended up to date ) have prayed for a direction to be given upon the o.ps. to pay the maturity amount as well as the principal amount of all investments, to pay compensation @ 10% of total amount of investments and Rs. 15,000/- as litigation costs along with other relief or reliefs as the Forum may deem fit and proper.
- Brief fact of the case is that complainants madeinvestmentsin the scheme of monthly interest schemes of o.ps. The o.ps.issued certificates vide Annexures in favour of the complainant which areas follows :
M.I.S. Certificate Nos. RISD-01601889, 01627941, M01-20122511-N, 20063600-N, IMID-01695422, 20008010-N, 20000788-N, 01714498, 01654420. M.I.S. Certificate Nos. 04826462-04826961, RISD-01614272, M01-20067430-N, RISD-01639277, MID-01663248. M.I.S. Certificate Nos. M01-20133737-N, M.I.S. Certificate Nos. 04827232-04827481, M.I.S. Certificate Nos. RISD-01629903.
- O.P.promised to pay the monthly interest as well as the maturity amount on the due dates to the complainants. O.ps. paid the monthly interest regularly upto November, 2012. Complainants repeatedly went to the office of o.ps but on different pleas they have returned the complainants without giving their monthly interest amount and maturity amount. It is further stated by the complainants that due to this non action and gross negligence on the part of the o.ps., complainants have been compelled to face tremendous problem due to scarcity of money with which they were supposed to meet their day to day expenditure, medical expenditure, children’s education etc. which are really at stake. So, finding no other alternative, complainants filed this instant petition praying for the aforesaid relief.
- Notice was served. O.ps. neither appeared nor filed any written version.
Accordingly, case was heard ex parte. - Two points arose for determination :
i) Is there any deficiency in service on the part of the O.Ps. ? Whether the complainants are entitled to get any relief as prayed for ? DECISION WITH REASONS : - Both the points aretaken up together for consideration. We have carefully gone through the complaint petition along with annexures filed by the complainants and noted its contents. Complainants invested in the o.ps. company. It is a fact that o.ps. have failed to pay the monthly interest since December, 2012 for which complainants felt tremendous monetary problem. Because, people invest their hard earned money in a reputed company to get the ultimate benefit at their need. O.ps. have miserably failed to keep their promise which they made on the face of the certificates issued by them in favour ofcomplainants. For their gross negligence in discharging duties, complainants had to suffer a lot for the crying need of money. Sacrificing many present enjoyments involving monetary expenditure, complainants made those investments foreseeing their future needs. If that criteria is not fulfilled due to o.ps.’severe negligence, complainants are, thereby, truly prejudiced which can be very well understood by a man of common prudence. Moreover, the o.ps. have not cared to appear before the Forum even after receiving summons. No W/V has been filed by them which clearly shows that they have nothing to put forward in their favour. And the complaint petition remains unchallenged and uncontroverted. And we have no difficulty to believe the unchallenged testimony of the complainants.O.ps. have miserably failedto keep promise which certainly amounts to deficiency inservice coupled with unfair trade practice on theirpart which should not be allowed to be perpetuated for an indefinite period.And we are of the candid opinion that it is a fit case where the prayers of the complainants should be allowed. Points under consideration are accordingly decided.
Hence, O R D E R E D That the C. C. Case No. 341 of 2014 ( HDF 341 of 2014 ) be allowed ex parte with costs against the O.Ps. That the O.Ps. are jointly and severally directed to pay the maturity amount as well as principal amount along with upto date monthly due interest in terms of the certificates in question to the complainants within one month from this order i.d., @ 9 p.a. interest shall be charged on the entire decreetal amount till actual payment. The complainants do get an award of Rs. 5,000/- as compensation and Rs. 2,000/- litigation cost and o.p. is directed to pay the same within one month from this order i.d. amount shall carry an interest @ 9% p.a. till actual payment The complainants are at liberty to put the decree into execution after expiry of the appeal period. Supply the copies of the order to the parties, as per rule. DICTATED & CORRECTED BY ME. ( Jhumki Saha ) Member, C.D.R.F.,Howrah. | |