Tamil Nadu

South Chennai

CC/257/2017

R.Ranganathan - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Chairman, TANGEDCO (TNEB) - Opp.Party(s)

S.Nambirajan

28 Nov 2018

ORDER

                                                                                Date of Filing  : 21.08.2017                                                                      

                                                                                 Date of Order  : 28.11.2018

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)

@ 2ND Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3.

 

PRESENT: THIRU. M. MONY, B.Sc., L.L.B, M.L.                : PRESIDENT

                 TMT. K. AMALA, M.A., L.L.B.                           :  MEMBER-I

   

C.C. No.257/2017

DATED THIS WEDNESDAY THE 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018

R. Ranganathan,

S/o. Mr. Rajan,

No.18, Subbu Street,

Thiruvanmiyur,

Chennai – 600 041.                                                      .. Complainant.

                                                          ..Versus..       

1. The Chairman,

TANGEDCO (TNEB),

Anna Salai,

Chennai – 600 002.

 

2.  The Deputy Financier Controller,

TNEB,

K.K. Nagar,

Chennai.       

 

3. The Asst. Engineer,

O & M, TNEB, Sasthri Nagar,

(CEDC/ South), Besant Nagar,

Chennai – 600 090.                                              .. Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for the complainant                   : M/s. S. Nambirajan &               

                                                                   others

Counsel for the opposite parties 1 to 3  : M/s. R.Amernath Rao

                                                                   Khande & another

                                                           

ORDER

THIRU. M. MONY, PRESIDENT

 

This complaint has been filed by the complainant against the opposite parties under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 praying to pay a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- together with interest thereon at 24% p.a. towards compensation for mental agony and hardship sustained on account of delinquent, negligent and deficiency in service with cost to the complainant.

 

Proof affidavit of complainant not filed for a long time to prove the allegations in the complaint.  The complainant and Counsel absent for a long time.  Hence, this complaint is dismissed for default.

 

 

MEMBER –I                                                                       PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.