Assam

StateCommission

MA/6/2017

Smti. Indrani Baishya - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Chairman, State Bank of India - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. U. J. Saikia

09 Feb 2017

ORDER

BEFORE THE ASSAM STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
GUWAHATI
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/6/2017
In
Complaint Case No. CC/4/2011
 
1. Smti. Indrani Baishya
D/o Late Prakash Chandra Medhi W/o Sri Ram Chandra Baishya Sreenagar Path, Bye Lane-7, House No 5, Guwahati-5, P.S.-Dispur
Kamrup
Assam
2. Sri Randio Kr. Medhi
D/o Late Prakash Chandra Medhi Sreenagar Path, Bye Lane-7, House No 5, Guwahati-5, P.S.-Dispur
Kamrup
Assam
3. Smt. Srabani Baishya
D/o Late Prakash Chandra Medhi W/o Sri Amitav Baishya R/o Santipur, Main Road, House No. 15, Guwahati-7
Kamrup
Assam
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. The Chairman, State Bank of India
State Bank Bhavan, 4th Floor, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021
Maharastra
2. State Bank of India
Panbazar Main Branch, Guwahati-781001
Kamrup
Assam
3. The Chief General Manager, State Bank of India
Local Head Office, Dispur, Guwahati-6
Kamrup
Assam
4. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India
Panbazar Main Branch, Guwahati-781001
Kamrup
Assam
5. Smti. Mridula Bhattacharjee, Locker-in-Charge, State Bank of India
Panbazar Main Branch, Guwahati-781001
Kamrup
Assam
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE A. Hazarika PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta MEMBER
 HON'BLE MS. Renu Prava Mahanta MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:Mr. U. J. Saikia, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. V. K. Baruah, Advocate
Dated : 09 Feb 2017
Final Order / Judgement

            Heard Mr. U.J. Saikia, learned counsel, appearing for the complainant. Also heard Mr. V.K. Baruah, learned counsel, appearing for the opposite parties.

              This is an application Under Order 22 Rule 1 and 3 read with Section151 of CPC for substituting the legal heirs of the deceased complainant No. 1.

  We have perused the statement made on oath in the application. It has been submitted that Prakash Ch. Medhi, complainant No. 1 expired on 21-10-2016 leaving behind Smt. Indrani Baishya, Smt. Srabani Baishya, daughters and Sri Randip Kr. Medhi, only son. Mr. Baruah, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party has no objection to the prayer for substitution. Accordingly, above mentioned legal heirs are substituted in place of complainant No. 1 as complainant Nos. 1(A), 1(B) and 1(C).

              Misc Case is allowed and dispose of.

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE A. Hazarika]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Dilip Kr. Mahanta]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MS. Renu Prava Mahanta]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.