Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/55/2019

Sri Arun Kumar Das, aged about 47 yrs - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Chairman, State Bank of India, Mumbai - Opp.Party(s)

Sri Girish Chandra Panda

22 Jul 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/55/2019
( Date of Filing : 17 Sep 2019 )
 
1. Sri Arun Kumar Das, aged about 47 yrs
S/o. Saradendu Das, At/P.O- Kuligaon, P.S- Khantapada, Dist- Balasore-756043.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Chairman, State Bank of India, Mumbai
16th Floor, Madam Cama Road, Mumbai-400021.
Maharashtra
2. The Managing Director, H.D.F.C Bank House, Mumbai
1st Floor, C.S No.6/242, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai-400013.
Maharashtra
3. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Nilgiri Branch, Raj Nilgiri
At/P.O- Nilgiri, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
4. The Branch Manager, H.D.F.C Bank, Balasore
F.M Circle, Dist- Balasore-756001.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 Sj. Sarat Kumar Mishra, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Sri Pradeep Kumar Mishra & others , Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Sj. Sarat Kumar Mishra, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
 Sri Pradeep Kumar Mishra & others, Advocate for the Opp. Party 0
Dated : 22 Jul 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case is posted today for hearing. Advocate for the complainant is absent, no steps filed. Advocates for the O.Ps are present & filed their separate haziras. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up. Perused the case record.

                                         In the present case, though all the O.Ps were appeared, but only O.Ps No.1 & 3 filed w/v and O.Ps No.2 & 4 have not filed w/v. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 18.03.20 to till today and also not received the copy of w/v of O.Ps No.1 & 3, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is presumed that the complainant has no interest to prosecute his own case. Considering the nature & conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.