Andhra Pradesh

Chittoor-II at triputi

CC/60/2018

Hoshanth Kalikiri, S/o K.Hari Prasad Reddy - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Motorola Mobility India Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

G.Guru prasad

30 Oct 2019

ORDER

Filing Date: 20.09.2018

Order Date:30.10.2019

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II,

CHITTOOR AT TIRUPATI

 

      PRESENT: Sri. T.Anand, President (FAC),

                Smt. T.Anitha, Member

 

WEDNESDAY THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER, TWO THOUSAND AND NINETEEN

 

C.C.No.60/2018

 

Between

 

Hoshanth Kalikiri,

S/o. K.Hari Prasad Reddy,

Hindu, aged about 19 years,

D.No.5-5-324, Reservoir Road,

Tirupati,

Chittoor District.                                                                                 … Complainant.

 

And

 

1.         The Chairman-cum-Managing Director,

            Motorola Mobility India Pvt. Ltd.,

            No.66/1, Plot No.5, 4th and 5th Floor,

            CBR Building, C.V.Raman Nagar,

            Bangalore – 560 093.

 

2.         The KONDE Products and Services Ltd.,

            Rep. by its authorized signatory,

            S.No.696, Gundla Pochampalli Village,

            Medchal Mandal,

            Rangareddy District,

            Telangana.

 

3.         India Mobile Service,

            Rep. by Authorised Signatory,

            Centre of Motorola,

Rajaji Nagar,

Bangalore.

 

4.         Sri Valli Communication,

            Rep. by its Authorised Signatory,

            D.No.17, Motorola Service Centre,

            G.Car Street,

            Tirupati.                                                                                      …  Opposite parties.

 

            Counsel for the complainant                      :           Sri.G.Guru Prasad.

 

            Counsel for opposite parties 2 and 3        :           Sri.C.Poorna Chand.

           

 

ORDER

DELIVERED BY SRI. T.ANAND, PRESIDENT(FAC)

ON BEHALF OF THE BENCH

           

            Complainant’s father present. Counsel for complainant present. Opposite parties 2 and 3 counsel also present. Opposite parties 1 and 4 remained exparte. Complainant filed memo stating that matter is settled out of Forum, as the opposite parties replaced new mobile phone i.e. Moto G5S in the place of defective phone with one year warranty from today. The father of the complainant received the sealed and packed phone.

            2.  Heard. In view of the memo filed by the complainant, the complaint is dismissed, as settled out of Forum. No costs. 

Pronounced in the Open Forum this the 30th October, 2019.

 

      Sd/-                                                                                                                  Sd/-                                        

Lady Member                                                                                              President(FAC)

 

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

 

NIL

 

                                                                                                                                  Sd/-     

                                                                                                                President (FAC)

    

     // TRUE COPY //

// BY ORDER //

 

Head Clerk/Sheristadar,

              Dist. Consumer Forum-II, Tirupati.

 

          

     

Copies to:-     1.  The complainant.

                        2.  The opposite parties.                      

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.