Karnataka

Belgaum

CC/28/2015

Anjana R Wagale - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Chairman, Bharati Mahila Credit Souharad Sahakari Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

B T Vibhute And B B Vibhute

11 May 2015

ORDER

                                  (Order dictated by Smt. S.S.Kadrollimath, Member.)

ORDER

          U/s.12 of the C.P. Act, complainants have filed the complaint against the O.Ps. alleging deficiency in service of non payment of the amount of the matured F.D.R.

          2) The O.P. inspite of service of notice remained absent and placed exparte.

          3) In support of the claim in the complaint, complainant has filed affidavit and original F.D.R. is produced by the complainant.

          4) We have heard the arguments and perused the records.

          5) Now the point for our consideration is that whether the complainant has proved deficiency in service on the part of the O.Ps. and entitled to the reliefs sought?

          6) Our finding on the point is partly in affirmative, for the following reasons.

:: R E A S O N S ::

          7) From the evidence on record it has been proved that in F.D.R. Account No.4994 a sum of Rs.40,942/- on 30/7/2003 was kept by the complainant in the O.P. society and the maturity value as on 30/01/2009 was Rs.82,748/- and the agreed interest rate was 13% P.A.

          8) Grievance of the complainant is that after maturity inspite of the repeated requests the maturity value was not paid and hence there is deficiency in service. These facts alleged in the complaint are stated by the complainant in the affidavit. Hence, deficiency in service is proved.

          9) Taking in to consideration of various aspects and the decision of Hon’ble Apex Court reported in (2011) SCCR 268 and of the Hon’ble Apex Commission reported in 2013 (2) CPR 574 as well as other subsequent decisions absolutely it is just and necessary to impose cost on daily basis if order remains uncomplied within the period fixed for compliance of the order, so as to have feeling and pinch.

          10) Accordingly, following order.

ORDER

          The complaint is partly allowed.

          The O.Ps. represented by the Chairman and Secretary jointly and severely are hereby directed to pay a sum of matured amount of Rs.82,748/- in respect of F.D.R. Account No.4994 to the complainants with interest at the rate of 8% P.A. from 30/01/2009 till realization of the entire amount.

          Further, the O.Ps. represented by the Chairman and Secretary jointly and severely are hereby directed to pay a sum of Rs.3,000/- to the complainants towards costs of the proceedings.

          The order shall be complied within 30 days from the date of the order.

If the order is not complied within stipulated period, O.P. is hereby directed to pay a sum of Rs.50/- per day to the complainant from the date of disobedience of order, till the order is complied.

 (Order dictated, corrected and then pronounced in the open Forum on: 11th day of May 2015)

Member                Member                                    President.

gm*

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.