Karnataka

Belgaum

CC/106/2015

Sangram J Sarda - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Chairman Aashraya Group ( A Branch of Aashraya Construction - Opp.Party(s)

D H Choudhari

22 Jun 2015

ORDER

(Order dictated by Smt. S.S.Kadrollimath, Member)

ORDER

          The complainants have filed the complaint u/s. 12 of the C.P. Act, against the O.Ps. alleging deficiency in service of non payment of the amount kept in Mutual benefit scheme.

          2) O.Ps. inspite of the service of the notice, have remained absent and set exparte.

3) In support of the claim in the complaint, complainant has filed affidavit and certain documents including original Mutual benefit certificate is produced. We have heard arguments of the complainant’s counsel and perused the record.

4) Now the point for our consideration is that, whether the complainant has proved deficiency in service on the part of the O.Ps. and that the complainant is entitled to the reliefs sought?

5) Finding on the point is partly in affirmative for the following reasons.

REASONS

6) The grievance of the complainant is that, inspite of the demands made the Mutual benefit amount remained unpaid by the OPs. The complainant is the member to the scheme and his membership No.917 as per the certificate and he invested Rs.45,000/- on 20/08/2008 and the maturity value is Rs.55,000/- and maturity date was on 20/06/2013. This fact is stated in the affidavit by the Complainant. Considering the entire facts, it is proved that inspite of the demands made the amount remained unpaid and the said act of the Ops, amounts to deficiency in service.

7) Taking in to consideration of various aspects and the decision of Hon’ble Apex Court reported in (2011) SCCR 268 and of the Hon’ble Apex Commission reported in 2013 (2) CPR 574 as well as other subsequent decisions, absolutely it is just and necessary to impose cost on daily basis if order remains uncomplied within the period fixed for compliance of the order, so as to have feeling and pinch.

          8) Accordingly, following order.

ORDER

          Complaint is partly allowed.

The O.Ps. represented by the Chairman and Manager as shown in the cause title jointly and severely are hereby directed to pay to the complainant the amount kept in mutual benefit scheme of Rs.55,000/- in respect of the  membership bearing No.917 with interest at the rate of 8% P.A. from 20/06/2013 till realization of the entire amount

Further, The O.P. represented by the Chairman and Manager as shown in the cause title jointly and severely are hereby directed to pay a sum of Rs.2,000/- to the complainant towards costs of the proceedings.

Order shall be complied within one month from the date of the order.

If the order is not complied within stipulated period, Chairman and Manager as shown in the cause title jointly and severely are hereby directed to pay a sum of Rs.50/- per day to the complainant from the date of disobedience of order till the order is complied.

(Order dictated, corrected and then pronounced in the open Forum on: 22nd day of June 2015).

           Member                   Member                    President.

gm*

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.