West Bengal

Hooghly

MA/22/2024

SRI ARITRA SIL - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE BRNACH MANAGER AXIS BANK LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

SANDIP KR DUTTA

07 May 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HOOGHLY
CC OF 2021
PETITIONER
VERS
OPPOSITE PARTY
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/22/2024
( Date of Filing : 07 Mar 2024 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/41/2024
 
1. SRI ARITRA SIL
222 OLAICHANDITALA, P.O- HOOGHLY, PIN- 712103
HOOGHLY
WEST BNEGAL
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. THE BRNACH MANAGER AXIS BANK LTD.
AXIS BANK,4TH FLOOR, KOLKATA 700071
KOLKATA
WEST BENGAL
2. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER AXIS BANK
ONW WORLD TOWER , TOWER 2A, MUMBAI 400013
MUMBAI
WEST BNEGAL
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Babita Choudhuri PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Debasis Bhattacharya MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 07 May 2024
Final Order / Judgement

         On perusal of the corresponding CC case records, instant MA case records and all other relevant aspects, it transpires that there is a prima facie case in favour of the Complainant.

Allegedly, the applicant of this MA case (complainant of the CC case), an account holder of the OP bank was granted a loan of Rs.7,35,925/-  by the OP bank consequent upon simply an audio call and video call made to the Complainant account holder.

 Reportedly, immediately after sanction of the loan, an amount of Rs.4,93,500/- had been debited and transferred to an unknown bank account.
        Balance of convenience and inconvenience appears to be in favour of the Complainant.

    The Commission is of the opinion that there is apparent urgency for passing an ad-interim order, otherwise the main purpose of passing the order in the instant MA case would be defeated by delay and the applicant is supposed to suffer irreparable loss.

In view of the above and on consideration of nature and character of the case and concentrating on the facts and circumstances of the case, this District Commission opines that at this stage an order of maintaining status quo by both the sides should be maintained in respect of all proceedings and transactions related to the alleged loan account in the name of the applicant involving an amount of Rs.7,35,925/-, payment of EMI thereof and providing default information to different credit information institutions such as CIBIL.

For this reason the interest of both parties should not be affected in any way.

So both the parties are directed to maintain status quo so far as further proceedings and transactions related to the alleged loan A/c and providing default information to different credit information Bureaus are concerned.  

In the light of the observations made hereinabove the instant MA case is disposed of accordingly.

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Babita Choudhuri]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Debasis Bhattacharya]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.