Andhra Pradesh

Kurnool

CC/25/2009

N.Venkateswara Rao, S/o N.Sarveshwara Rao - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Post Master, Narasimharao Pet Post Office - Opp.Party(s)

N. Ramachandra

07 Jun 2010

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/25/2009
 
1. N.Venkateswara Rao, S/o N.Sarveshwara Rao
R/o H.No.43-262/1C, N.R.Peta, Sankalbagh, Kurnool-518 004.
Kurnool
Andhra Pradesh
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Branch Post Master, Narasimharao Pet Post Office
43-193, Kurnool 518 004.
Kurnool
Andhra Pradesh
2. The Chief Post Master,
Head Post Office, 40/1, Main Road, Kurnool-518001
Kurnool
Andhra Pradesh
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.Sundara Ramaiah , B.Com B.L., PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.M.Kirshna Reddy, M.Sc, M.Phil., MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT FORUM:KURNOOL

Present: Sri. T.Sundara Ramaiah , B.Com B.L., President

And

Sri. M.Krishna  Reddy , M.Sc., M.Phil., Male Member

Monday  the 07th day of June, 2010

C.C.No. 25/09

Between:

 

N.Venkateswara Rao, S/o N.Sarveshwara Rao,

R/o H.No.43-262/1C, N.R.Peta, Sankalbagh,  Kurnool-518 004.          

 

                                              …Complainant

 

-Vs-

 

1. The Branch Post Master, Narasimharao Pet Post Office,

43-193, Kurnool 518 004.

 

2. The Chief Post Master,

Head Post Office, 40/1, Main Road,  Kurnool-518001.                   

 

         …Opposite PartieS

 

 

 

This complaint is coming  on  this  day for orders in the presence  of  Sri. N. Ramachandra , Advocate, for complainant , and   Sri M.D.V.Jogaiah Sarma , Advocate for opposite parties  and upon perusing the material papers on record, the Forum made the following.

 

ORDER

(As per Sri. T.Sundara Ramiah, President)

C.C. No.25/09                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

 

1.     This complaint is filed under section 12 of the C. P. Act, 1986 praying to direct the Ops

a)     to pay Rs. 39,712/-  being the compensation

b)     to pay Costs of the petition ,

c)     and to grant such other relief as this Hon’ble Forum may deems fit and proper  in the circumstances of the case.

 

2. The case of the complainant in brief is as follows:- The complainant is doing shares business and he is a member of Religare Securities Limited. He had 3 accounts in OP.No.1 bearing Nos. 20432, 20433 and 20588 . He held an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- under the three accounts . The complainant wanted to purchase  shares  in Indian Bulls Real Estate as buying rate was very low . He  intended   to  withdraw the amount  from  OP.No.1  and  presented  the 3  pass  books , along  with withdrawal  forms  by 8-30 AM on  06-10-2008. At 3-30  PM   on  06-10-2008  one Nageswara Rao , Clerk informed  the complainant that amount was not available on that day. On 07-10-2008 morning the complainant was informed that it was a Bank holiday  and he was asked to come on the next day i.,e 08-10-2008 at 3-30 PM. The share business closed by 3-30 PM . The complainant could not purchase shares in  Indian Bulls Real Estate  at lower rate  as the amount was paid to him at 3-30 PM . The complainant could not get the amount of profit an account of negligence of Ops . The complainant could not purchase  the Indian Bulls Real Estate  at Rs.101/- on 08-10-2008. The complainant also incurred loss of Rs.11,000/-  on account of early with drawl  of amount from the  post office. Hence the complaint.  

 

3.     OP.No.2 filed written version and the same was adopted by OP.No.1. It is stated in the written version of OP.No.2 that the  complaint is not maintainable  in law. The complainant was holding  3 MIS  accounts  in OP.No.1 branch . The pass books along withdrawal  forms were not presented  on 06-10-2008. The complainant approached OP.No.1 on 07-10-2008 at 11-00 AM and submitted  3 MIS account pass books along with SB-7 withdrawal forms duly filled by him. As per the Citizens Charter  of Postal Department  if the savings  account is closed prematurely in any sub post office , it would be settled and payment would be made within 2 working days. On 07-10-2008 was declared holiday  for the Nationalized Banks due to strike by the bank employees. OP.No.1 secured  the required  cash from OP.NO.2  on 08-10-2008  and made payment to the complainant  at 3-30 PM while receiving the cash from OP.NO.1, the complainant  did not express any grievance. There was no inconvenience or hardship to the complainant . In case of premature  closer  of the MIS account , 1% of the deposit  amount can be withheld by  way of penalty . In case of premature closer,  depositors could not be entitled any bonus. The claim of compensation of Rs.39,172/- has no legal basis. There is no deficiency of service on the part of the Ops  . The complaint is liable to be dismissed.

 

4.     On behalf of the complainant Ex. A1 to A12 are marked .The complainant filed  his Sworn affidavit . On behalf of the opposite parties Ex.B1 to B5 are marked and the Sworn affidavits of K.Gorantlaiah  , Sub Post Master  and Ch. Durgaiah , Chief Post Master , Kurnool  are filed.

 

5.     On the basis of the above pleadings the points that arise for consideration are

      

(i) whether there is deficiency of service on the part of the

respondents/ opposite parties ?

(ii) Whether the complainant is entitled to the relief as prayed

for?

(iii) To what relief?

 

6.     Both parties filed written arguments.

 

7.     Point No.1 & 2:  Admittedly the complainant along  with          N. Madhurama were holding  3 MIS accounts in N.R.Peta , Post Office , Kurnool . Ex.A1 to A3 are the  pass books  issued by OP.No.1 infavour of the complainant and one N. Madhurama  . It is the case of the  complainant  that in order to purchase in Indian Bulls Real Estate shares ,he applied  for premature  withdrawal  of the amount from OP.No.1  by presenting the pass books on 06-10-2008 . On the other hand it is the contention of the Ops  that the complainant did not  present the pass books  before OP.No.1 on 06-10-2008 and that the  complainant  presented the pass books along withdrawal forms  for premature  withdrawal  of amount on 07-10-2008. The complainant   in his sworn affidavit stated that he filled withdrawal forms and presented the  3 pass books on 06-10-2008. The complaint relied  on Ex.A9 said to have been issued by one Nageswara Rao working as a Clerk  in the office of OP.No.1 . It is simply mentioned in the Ex.A9 the MIS account NO’s of the complainant and another. There is no mention in Ex.A9 that the complainant presented the pass  books  along  with withdrawal  forms  for  premature  withdrawal  of  the  amount  on  06-10-08. The complainant has  not choosen to examine the person  who is said to have issued the original  of Ex.A9. OP.No.1 filed Ex.B3 to B5 to show that the complainant presented the withdrawal forms  along with the pass books on 07-10-2008 only.  Sri. K. Gorantlaiah ,Sub Post Maser of OP.No.1 in his sworn affidavit has stated that the  complainant approached  the OP.No.1 on 07-10-2008 at 11-00 AM and submitted the withdrawal forms duly signed by him. He denied that on 06-10-2008  the complainant approached  the OP.No.1 branch and submitted  the withdrawal forms  . As seen from  Ex.B2 to B5 it is very clear  that withdrawal  forms were submitted on 07-10-2008 . It is submitted by the learned counsel  appearing  for the complainant  that the dates  in Ex.B3 to B5  were put up by the staff  of OP.No.1 . As seen from  Ex.B3 to B5 it is very clear that all the blanks  on the left side of the withdrawal form were filled up by one  and same person. It is not the case of the complainant that he simply signed the  withdrawal  forms  Ex.B3 to B5  without filling  up the blanks  there in . For the first  time it is argued  by the learned counsel  appearing for the complainant  the date as 07-10-2008 in Ex.B3 to B5 was put up by the staff of the OP.No.1 in order to defeat the claim of the complainant . There is no necessity  for the staff of OP.NO.1 to put wrong dates in Ex.B3 to B5 . The complainant did not give any explanation  as to why he gave the blank  withdrawal forms  to OP.No.1. There  is no  force in the contention  of the complainant  that the date in Ex.B3 to B5  was put up by the staff of the OP.No.1 As seen from Ex.B3 to B5 it is very clear  that the  withdrawal  forms along with pass books were presented to OP.No.1 on 07-10-2008 .

 

8.     Admittedly the complainant was paid the amount on 08-10-2008  at about 3-00 or 3-30 PM . According to the Ops  there was no delay in payment of the amount  to the complainant . The Ops  filed Ex.B2 copy of the Citizen Charter of the Postal Department. In Ex.B2 it is mentioned that a premature closer of the account  must be done within two working days in case of sub post office . Admittedly the OP.No.1 is a sub post office situated at N.R.Peta , Kurnool. Admittedly the complainant received the amount due on 08-10-2008 . Ex.B3 to B5 go to show that the complainant  presented the  pass books  along withdrawal forms  on 07-10-2008 . As the amount was paid  to the complainant  within two working days from the date of presentation  of the withdrawal forms along with pass books it cannot be said that there was  deficiency of service on the part of the Ops .

 

9.     It is the case of the complainant that he was doing shares business and that he intended  to purchase Indian Bulls Real Estate  shares with the amount withdrawn by him from OP.No.1 post office. The complainant to show  that he  was doing shares business relied on Ex.A8 to Ex.A12. Ex.A8 is the letter addressed to the complainant  by                      Religare Securities Limited. It shows that the complainant  is having trading account to trade in shares through Religare Securities Limited. Simply because the complainant was having a D-MAT and trading account it cannot be said  that the complainant  wanted to purchase Indian Bulls Real Estate shares on 07-10-2008 . It  is not  the  case   of the complainant  that  he  purchased   the  said  shares  subsequent

08-10-2008 . The complainant filed Ex.A4 data  showing the price of the Indian Bulls Real Estate shares on  08-10-2008. The lowest  price was Rs.100-40 on 08-10-2008  and highest price was 132-90   on   08-10-2008 . Simply because the complainant could not purchase  said shares  on 08-10-2008 it cannot be said  that he incurred loss of profit of Rs.28,710/- . Had the complainant  incurred such an amount of loss on 08-10-2008 he would  have issued a notice to the Ops  immediately stating that on account of their negligence he incurred loss . The complainant kept quite for a long time and got issued a notice to the Ops  on 29-10-2008. The in action of the complainant till 29-10-2008 would go  to indicate  that he did not intend to purchase the shares on 08-10-08. The case of the complainant  that he wanted  to purchase  shares on 08-10-2008 and that he could not purchase  the same on that day due to late payment of the amount by Ops is only a after thought.  There  was no negligence on the part of the Ops  in payment of the amount to the complainant  under 3 MIS  accounts.

 

10.    It is also the case of the complainant that on account of premature  withdrawal  he was not paid bonus of Rs.10,000/- and that an amount of Rs.1,000/- was deducted  as a penalty . The complainant in his sworn affidavit clearly stated  that he wanted  withdrawal the amount  prematurely  for going 10%  bonus. The complainant is also aware  that in case  of premature closer  of the MIS account , 1% of the deposit amount will be withheld by way of penalty .As the complainant wanted to close the account prematurely , the opposite parties rightly  withheld bonus of 10% and 1% by way of penalty. The Ops  acted  according to rules . The amount was paid to the complainant within the time.  Therefore it is not open to the complainant  to hesitate that he sustained loss  of Rs.39,712/-   on account of the payment of the amount on 08-10-2008 at 3-30 PM..

 

11.    In the result, the complaint is dismissed . In the circumstances of the case without costs.

 

Dictated to the stenographer, transcribed by her , corrected and pronounced by us in the open bench on this the  07th day of June, 2010.

                                                                                

           Sd/-                                                                                       Sd/-

MALE MEMBER                                                              PRESIDENT

  

 APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses Examined

 

 

For the complainant : Nil            For the opposite parties :Nil

 

 

List of exhibits marked for the complainant:-

 

Ex.A1        Pass book of A/C No.20432.

 

Ex.A2.       Pass book of A/C No.20433.

 

Ex.A3.       Pass book of A/C No.20588.

 

Ex.A4.       Data for IBREALEST of dt.8-10-08.

 

Ex.A5.       Office Copy of Legal Notice dt.29-10-08 along with Two Postal Acks.

 

Ex.A6.       Letter of OP dt.10-11-08 In Reply to Complainant letter dt.31-10-08.

 

Ex.A7.       Office Copy of Letter dt.12-11-08 in Response to EX.A6.

 

Ex.A8.       Letter dt.Nil Addressed by Religare to the Complainant

 

Ex.A9.       Xerox Copy of the Receipt dt.6-10-08.

 

Ex.A10.      Receipt of  Religare  Securities Limited New Delhi

dt.10-3-09 for Rs.50,000/- .

 

Ex.A11.      Receipt of  Religare  Securities Limited New Delhi

dt.20-2-08 for Rs.62,000/-.

 

Ex.A12.      Axis Bank ATM slip dt.11-10-08.

 

 

 

List of exhibits marked for the opposite parties:

 

Ex.B1.       Xerox Copy of SB.Order No.16/2008 dt.20-8-08.

Ex.B2.       Xerox Copy of Citizen Charter of the Postal Department.

Ex.B3.       With Drawal Form dt.07-10-08 A/C No.20432 for Rs.50,000/-.

 

Ex.B4.       With Drawal Form dt.07-10-08 A/C No.20433 for Rs.30,000/-.

 

Ex.B5.       With Drawal Form dt.07-10-08 A/C No.20588 for Rs.20,000/-.

 

      

        Sd/-                                                                  Sd/-          MALE MEMBER                                                                    PRESIDENT

 

 

// Certified free copy communicated under Rule 4 (10) of the

A.P.S.C.D.R.C. Rules, 1987//

Copy to:-

Complainant and Opposite parties

Copy was made ready on :

Copy was dispatched    on:

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.Sundara Ramaiah , B.Com B.L.,]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.M.Kirshna Reddy, M.Sc, M.Phil.,]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.