NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/1684/2006

SIDHI VINAYAK FERRO LSPAT LTD. ROUKELA - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE BRANCH MANAGER , ICICI BANK & ORS , - Opp.Party(s)

MANOJ KUMAR DASS

10 May 2010

ORDER

Date of Filing: 17 Jul 2006

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/1684/2006
(Against the Order dated 26/06/2006 in Appeal No. 516/2006 of the State Commission Orissa)
1. SIDHI VINAYAK FERRO LSPAT LTD. ROUKELA INDUSTRIAL AREA PO. ROURKELA -4 , PS. RAGHUNATHPALI DISTT, SUNDARGARH REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS MANAGIN ORISSA ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. THE BRANCH MANAGER , ICICI BANK & ORS , PLOT NO , 445. MADHUSUDAN CHOWK BISRA ROAD PO. ROURKELA 769001 DISTT , SUNDARGARH ORISSA 2. SHAYAM LAL SINGHALW-8, CIVIL TOWNSHIP, P.O.ROURKELA-4P.S. RAGHUNATHPALI, DIST. SUNDARGARHORISSA ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. S.K. NAIK ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :NEMO
For the Respondent :Mr. Ateev Mathur, ADv. for MR. SANJAY SHARMA , Advocate MR. R.P. DASH

Dated : 10 May 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

          Notice was issued to the petitioner as well as his counsel on 16.3.2010.  ADs have not been received back served or otherwise.  30 days from the date of issuance of notice are over.  Presumed to be served.  Neither petitioner nor his counsel is present.  Dismissed for non-prosecution.


-2-

          It may be stated here that the petitioner was not a party before the District Forum.  Petitioner had moved an application for impleadment which was dismissed by the District Forum which order was upheld by the State Commission in the appeal.  Present Revision Petition is directed against the order of the State Commission declining the impleadment application.

            Counsel for the respondents have brought to our notice that a similar Revision Petition No.1685/2006 filed by the petitioner on similar grounds has already been dismissed on 25.7.2008 by a Bench of this Commission in the presence of counsel for the petitioner.  Counsel for the respondents also inform that the proceedings in the fora below have also come to an end and there is no litigation pending between the parties before the fora below.  Dismissed for non-prosecution as well as in terms of the order passed by this Commission dated 25.7.2008 in Revision Petition No.1685/2006.



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................S.K. NAIKMEMBER