Sushila Devi Kedia filed a consumer case on 25 Oct 2016 against The Branch Manager,Eureka Forbes Limited in the Cuttak Consumer Court. The case no is CC/120/2015 and the judgment uploaded on 04 Nov 2016.
IN THE COURT OF THE DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,CUTTACK.
C.C No.120/2015
Smt. Sushila Devi Kedia,
W/O:Sri Sitaram Kedia,
Banka Bazar,Cuttack. … Complainant.
Vrs.
Eureka Forbes Limited,
Behind Nishamani Talkies,
Link Road,Cuttack.
Eureka Forbes Limited,
7,Chakraberia Road(South),.
Kolkata.
Eureka Forbes Limited,
B/1/B/2,701,Marathan Innova,
Off Ganapatrao Kadam Marg,
Lower Parel,Mumbai.… Opp. Parties.
Present: Sri Dhruba Charan Barik,President.
Sri Bichitrananda Tripathy, Member.
Smt. Sarmistha Nath, Member (W).
Date of filing: 16.10.2015
Date of Order: 25.10.2016
For the complainant : Mr. H.R.Kedia,Adv. & Associates.
For the O.Ps. : Exparte.
Smt. Sarmistha Nath,Member(W).
The complainant being a consumer has filed this complaint before this Forum against the O.Ps for redressal of his grievances under the C.P.Act,1986(Act in short) in terms of his prayer made in the complaint petition. The allegation made in the complaint is with regard to defects in the goods purchased by him and deficiency in service provided and unfair trade practice adopted by the O.Ps.
After receipt of the pleader’s notice the O.P.No.1 deputed a technician with an iron guard which is meant to safeguard the candle from iron deposits and on 25.3.2014 the Customer Service Division, Cuttack entered into a service contract for two years i.e. from 25.3.2014 to 24.3.2016 for providing periodical services against payment of Rs.2800/-. But the water purifier became inoperative and completely dead in the 1st week of August,2015.
ORDER
Since the O.Ps have failed to provide the required service for the said Aqua guard water purifier during the contract period of 2 years, the O.Ps are directed to refund a sum of Rs.2800/- taken by them towards service charges. The O.Ps will also pay a sum of Rs.5000/- as compensation towards mental agony and harassment and a further sum of Rs.2000/- towards cost of litigation. The prayer made by the complainant to replace the water purifier, to award a sum of Rs.50,000/- towards cost of treatment, Rs.25,000/- as compensation towards mental agony and harassment and Rs.10,000/- towards litigation cost is not maintainable taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the present case.
The above payments to the complainant must be completed within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of this order failing which the complainant is at liberty to take shelter of this Hon’ble Forum as per C.P.Act,1986.
Typed to dictation, corrected and pronounced by the Hon’ble Member in the Open Court on this the 25th day of October, 2016 under the seal and signature of this Forum.
( Smt. Sarmistha Nath )
Member(W)
.
(Sri D.C.Barik)
President.
(Sri B.N.Tripathy )
Member
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.