Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/211/2018

Dr.K. Gajendran, and another - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager,and 2 others - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. M.K. Madhubalan

01 Oct 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

C.C. No.211/2018

                         DATED THE 01^ST DAY OF OCTOBER 2021

                                                        

1. Dr. K. Gajendran,

S/o. Mr. Karuppan,

No.20, Balaji Nagar,

Opp. Uzhavar Santhai,

Singanallur,

Coimbatore - 5.  

 

2. Dr. Latha,

W/o. Mr. K. Gajendran,

No.20, Balaji Nagar,

Singanallur,

Coimbatore – 5.                                                                              .. Complainants.

-Versus-

 

1. The Branch Manager,

REPCO Home Financing Limited,

No.8/26, Indian Red Cross Building,

Hozur Road,

Coimbatore – 641 018.

 

2. The Manager,

REPCO Home Financing Limited,

No.33, North Usman Road,

T. Nagar,

Chennai – 600 017.

 

3. The General Manager,

National Housing Bank,

Department of Regulation and Supervision,

Complaint Redressal Cell, 4^th Floor Core,

No.5a, India Habitat Centre, Lothi Road,

New Delhi – 11003.                                                                              .. Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for the complainants             : M/s. M.K. Madhu Balan

Opposite parties                                 : Exparte

 

          This consumer complaint coming up before us on 01.10.2021 for appearance and filing of proof affidavit of complainant as last chance or for dismissal, this Commission made the following:-

 

Docket order

 

            No representation for complainant.  Today, this matter is posted for appearance of complainant and for filing proof affidavit of complainant as last chance or for dismissal.  When this matter was called at 10.30 A.M., there was no representation for complainant.  Hence, the matter was passed over and again called at 12.45 P.M., the complainant was again not present, Proof Affidavit also not filed.  Since the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case, the complaint is dismissed for default.  No cost.

 

 

                    Sd/-                                                                                         Sd/-                                                                         

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                              R.SUBBIAH                        

            MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT