Kerala

Idukki

cc/10/60

Sarala W/o Damodharan - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.Fenil Jose

31 Aug 2010

ORDER


CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKIConsumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Idukki, Kuyilimala, Painavu PO-685603
Complaint Case No. cc/10/60
1. Sarala W/o DamodharanJyothy Bhavan,Chelachuvadu,KanjikuzhyIdukkiKerala ...........Appellant(s)

Versus.
1. The Branch ManagerK.S.F.E Ltd., KottayamKottayamKerala2. The Special Deputy TahasildarRevenue Recovery,K.S.F.E,Backer Junction,KottayamKottayamKerala ...........Respondent(s)



BEFORE:
HONORABLE Laiju Ramakrishnan ,PRESIDENTHONORABLE Sheela Jacob ,MemberHONORABLE Bindu Soman ,Member
PRESENT :

Dated : 31 Aug 2010
JUDGEMENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

DATE OF FILING : 08.03.2010

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKI

Dated this the 31st day of August, 2010

Present:

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN PRESIDENT

SMT.SHEELA JACOB MEMBER

SMT.BINDU SOMAN MEMBER

C.C No.60/2010

Between

Complainant : Sarala W/o Damodharan,

Jyothi Bhavan,

Chelachuvadu P.O,

Kanjikuzhy Village,

Idukki District.

(By Adv: Fenil Jose)

And

Opposite Parties : 1.The Branch Manager,

Kerala State Financial Enterprises Limited,

Kottayam Branch, Kottayam P.O.

2. The Branch Manager,

Kerala State Financial Enterprises Limited,

Thodupuzha Branch,

Thodupuzha P.O,

Idukki District.

3.The Special Deputy Tahsildar,

Revenue Recovery,

Kerala State Financial Enterprises Limited,

Baker Junction, Kottayam.

(All by Advs: K.M.Sanu & C.M.Kunjumuhammed)

O R D E R

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN(PRESIDENT)


 

Both parties are ready for a settlement. The counsel for the opposite party submitted that they are ready for rescheduling the loan of the complainant if the complainant pays the due amount to the opposite party. The counsel for the complainant is also ready for a settlement but requested 3 months time for payment. So the complainant is directed to pay the due amount of the loan within 2 months. The opposite parties are directed to reschedule the loan of the complainant after receiving the due amount of the loan, till that further proceedings against the complainant and her properties for the recovery of the loan may be kept in abeyance.


 

Pronounced in the Open Forum on this the 31st day of August, 2010

 

Sd/-

SRI. LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN(PRESIDENT)


 

Sd/-

SMT. SHEELA JACOB(MEMBER)


 

Sd/-

SMT. BINDU SOMAN(MEMBER)


 

APPENDIX : Nil


[HONORABLE Sheela Jacob] Member[HONORABLE Laiju Ramakrishnan] PRESIDENT[HONORABLE Bindu Soman] Member