West Bengal

Maldah

16/2008

Sanat Kumar Sarkar, 33yrs - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager - Opp.Party(s)

Arijit Neogi

23 Sep 2008

ORDER


District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Malda
Satya Chowdhuri Indoor Stadium , Malda
consumer case(CC) No. 16/2008

Sanat Kumar Sarkar, 33yrs
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

The Branch Manager
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:


Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MALDA,
MALDA D.F.ORIGINAL CASE NO. 16/2008
 
Date of filing of the Case: 25.02.2008 
 

Complainant
Opposite Party
Sanat Kumar Sarkar, 33 years
S/o. Sri Jitendranath Sarkar,
Vill. Sahapur, No. 4 Bimal Das Colony More, P.O. Sahapur, P.S & Dist. Malda
 
Present Address:
 
Vill. Mothabari Maheswapara,
P.O. Mothabari, P.S. Kaliachak,
Dist. Malda
1.
The Branch Manager,
Life Insurance Corporation of India,
Malda Branch-1, B.G. Road,
P.O. & Dist. Malda- 732 101.

 

Present:
1.
Smt. Sumana Das,        Member
2.
Dr. Soumen Sikder, Member.
 
 

For the Petitioner : Arijit Neogi, Advocate
For the O.P.s          Narendra Mohan Majumder, Advocate.
                           
Order No. 12      Dt. 23.09.2008
 
          Petitioner is personally present along with ld. advocate. Tanu Gogoin, Asst. Administrative Officer is present along with Ld. advocate.
 
          Hd. both sides at length. Ld lawyer for the petitioner files a verified petition stating therein that the petitioner was unable to supply the death certificate of her wife. Accordingly, post mortem report of the insured person (wife of petitioner) was submitted as a confirmed report of the death. The petitioner also prayed in his petition to consider the P.M. report as the confirmed date and cause of the death.
 
          In view of above ld. lawyer and the administrative office have satisfied by the clarification of the petitioner and submitted two cheques bearing Nos. 308676 dt.13.9.2008 amounting Rs.23,139/- and cheque No.308677 dt.13.9.2008 amounting Rs.22,000/-.
 
          The petitioner do accept the cheques by proper identification of the ld. advocate. Inform the petitioner.
 
 
 
LATER DT.23.09.2008:
 
          Petitioner accepts these two cheques mentioned above by proper identification of the ld. advocate with full satisfaction.
 
Hence,                           ordered,
that Malda D.F. Case No.16/2008 which was revived vide order No.3 dt.14.5.2008 disposed on contest with full satisfaction. There is no order as to cost.
 
          Let a copy of these two orders be given to parties at free of cost.
                   Sd/-                                                  Sd/-
                   Dr. Soumen Sikder                           Smt. Sumana Das
                   Member                                             Member     
                   D.C.D.R.F., Malda.                            D.C.D.R.F., Malda.