Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/252/2018

N.K.Masi, and another - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, - Opp.Party(s)

PARTY IN PERSON (B.R. Lakshmanan)

27 Feb 2023

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. A/252/2018
( Date of Filing : 28 Nov 2018 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/10/2018 in Case No. 252 of District The Nilgiris)
 
1. N.K.Masi, and another
The NIlgiris-643 214
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. The Branch Manager,
State Bank of India, Kotagiri-643 217
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. R.VENKATESAPERUMAL MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 27 Feb 2023
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                     BEFORE   Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                         Thiru.R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                ::      MEMBER

 

 FA. No. 252/2018

(Against the order in C.C. No. 37/2016  dt 5.10.2018 on the file of the DCDRC, The Nilgiris)

                                                   DATED THIS THE 27TH  DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023

 

1. N.K.Masi,

D.No.5/109, Billicombai & post,

The Nilgiris -  643 214                                     

 

2. B.R. Lakshmanan,

D.No.5/109, Billicombai & post,

The Nilgiris - 643 214                                      ..Appellants/complainants

                                            Vs

The Branch Manager,

State Bank of India,

Johnstone square,

Kotagiri  - 643  217                                       ..Respondent/opposite party

 

For the Appellants/complainants                    :       Party in person

Counsel for the Respondent/opposite party     :      M/s J.Pothiraj

 

          This appeal is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :  

 

                                                      Docket order

 

        No representation for both.   This appeal is posted today for appearance of both and for filing written arguments of both and for arguments in list or for dismissal.  When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M,  the appellant was not present  hence,  passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared.   Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.  Hence the appeal is dismissed for default.  No order as to cost.

      Sd/-                                                                                                         Sd/-

  R  VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                R. SUBBIAH

               MEMBER                                                                                  PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

              

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. R.VENKATESAPERUMAL]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.