Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/53/2021

Mohammed - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager - Opp.Party(s)

19 Jul 2022

ORDER

C.D.R.C. Kasaragod
Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/53/2021
( Date of Filing : 01 Mar 2021 )
 
1. Mohammed
aged 55 years S/o Soopy, Kanniyana house Badiaduka, Perdala P O Kasaragod taluk
Kasaragod
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Branch Manager
Kasaragod Primary Co-Operative Agricultural And Rural Development Bank Ltd No FF-113 Kasaragod Branch
Kasaragod
Kerala
2. The Senior Inspector or Special Sale Officer
Kasaragod primary Co-operative Agricultural and rural Development Bank Ltd No FF-113 Head office, Nayaks Road, Kasaragod PO
Kasaragod
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. KRISHNAN K PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Beena.K.G. MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. RadhaKrishnan Nair M MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 19 Jul 2022
Final Order / Judgement

 

 

 D.O.F:01/03/2021

                                                                                                  D.O.O:19/07/2022

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION KASARAGOD

CC.No.53/2021

Dated this, the 19th day of July 2022

PRESENT:

SRI.KRISHNAN.K                         :PRESIDENT

SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR.M : MEMBER

SMT.BEENA.K.G                            : MEMBER

 

Mohammed, aged 55 years,

S/o Soopy, Kanniyana house,                                        : Complainant

Badiadka, Perdala P.O

Kasaragod Taluk & District

(Adv: Shafi.M)

                                                       And

1.  The Branch Manager,

Kasaragod Primary Co.op Agricultural &

Rural Development Bank Ltd. No:FF-113,

Kasaragod Branch,

Kasaragod Taluk & District

                                                                                                    : Opposite parties

2. The Senior Inspector/Special Sale Officer,

Kasaragod Primary Co.op Agricultural &

Rural Development Bank Ltd. No:FF-113,

Head Office, Nayaks Road, Kasaragod (PO)

Kasaragod Taluk & District

(Adv: Jithesh Babu.P.K)

  1.  

SRI.KRISHNAN.K  :PRESIDENT

     Complainant and Opposite Party represented.  Complainant prayed time for evidence, rejected for the reason that repeated chance given to adduce evidence.   Hence complaint dismissed for default.

    Sd/-                                                                 Sd/-                                                 Sd/-

MEMBER                                                      MEMBER                                PRESIDENT

Forwarded by Order

 

                                                                                    Assistant Registrar

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. KRISHNAN K]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Beena.K.G.]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. RadhaKrishnan Nair M]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.