West Bengal

Murshidabad

CC/123/2017

Anoar Passa - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, United Bank of India, Lalbagh Branch - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Sambarta Mukherjee

01 Oct 2019

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Berhampore, Murshidabad.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/123/2017
( Date of Filing : 04 Aug 2017 )
 
1. Anoar Passa
S/O- Lt. Abdul Wahed Sk, Vill- Barafkhana, PO- Roshanbagh, PS- Murshidabad, Pin- 742164
Murshidabad
West Bengal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Branch Manager, United Bank of India, Lalbagh Branch
PO & PS- Murshidabad, Pin- 742149
Murshidabad
West Bengal
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. ASISH KUMAR SENAPATI PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. ALOKA BANDYOPADHYAY MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 01 Oct 2019
Final Order / Judgement

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   IN THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MURSHIDABAD AT BERHAMPORE.

CASE No.CC/123/2017  

 

 Date of Filing:            04.08.17                                      Date of Final Order: 01.10.19

 

Complainant:  Anoar Passa

                        S/o Late Abdul Wahed Sk.

                        Vill-Brafkhana, PO-Roshanbagh

                        PS&Dist-Murshidabad, Pin-742164

-Vs-

Opposite Party: The Branch Manager,

United Bank of India, Lalbagh Branch

                        PO,PS&Dist-Murshidabad, Pin-742149

 

Agent/Advocate for the Complainant           :  Sri. Sambarta Mukherjee

Agent/Advocate for the Opposite Party: Sri. Subhash Saha

                     

  Present: Sri Asish  Kumar Senapati………………….......President.                              

                             Smt. Aloka Bandyopadhyay……………………..Member.

                                                 FINAL ORDER

Mrs. Aloka Bandyopadhyay, Member

One Anoar Passa (here in after referred to as the Complainant) filed the case against Branch Manager, U.B.I., Lalbagh Branch (here in after referred to as the OP) praying for compensation alleging deficiency in service.

The brief fact of the case is as such:-

            The Complainant on 09.09.16 for the purpose of withdrawal of Rs.50,000/-, used the cheque  of UBI Lalbagh  Branch (O.P) where he has savings account and  he received the said amount from the O.P but at about 11.20 A,M the complainant received the message that Rs 10,000/- has been debited from his account and at about 13.20  he received another message that Rs. 50,000/- has been debited from the said savings account which he has withdrawn in that day from the aforesaid savings account . The complainant became astonished for debit of Rs 10,000/- on that day. Thereafter on 12/09/2019 the complainant enquired the matter and filled a written complainant before the O.P Bank. At the time of update of the aforesaid account he came to know that on 08/09/2016 the complainant has withdrawn a sum of Rs 10,000/- but before or after 07/09/2016 he never withdraw a sum of Rs 10,000/-either by using A.T.M or through cheque. But  after  several verbal as well as written request the O.P has not taken any steps for return of Rs. 10,000/-. Finding no other alternative the Complainant filed the instant case for appropriate relief.

            After service of notice  O.P  filed the w/v contending inter alia that the case is not maintainable as the complainant by using his ATM card in UBI Lalgola ATM Centre at station road  has withdrawn Rs. 10,000/- on 08/09/2016 and the transation of the complainant was successful. So there is no deficiency on the part of the O.P and the O.P prays for dismissal of the case with cost.

            Now the question arises whether the Complainant is a consumer and he is entitled to get relief, as prayed for?

Decision with reason

The Ld. Advocate for the Complainant submits that the Complainant is a consumer as he hired services of the OP No.1  for consideration.

On going through the complaint, written version and other materials on record and on a careful consideration over the submission of both sides, we find that the Complainant is a consumer in terms of section 2 (I )(d) (ii) of the C.P.Act, 1986.

            Undoubtedly, the Complainant for the purpose of withdrawal of Rs.50,000/- used the self-cheque  of UBI Lalbagh  Branch. But as per the statement of Complainant he received the said amount on 09/09/2016  and on the same day at about 11.20 A,M he received the message that Rs 10,000/- has been debited from his account and at about 13.20P.M he received another message that Rs. 50,000/- has been debited from the said savings account .Seeing the message he became puzzled because of that he has not withdrawn the aforesaid Rs 10,000/- on 09/09/2016 but it has been debited from his account balance. On due enquiry, he came to know that transaction was through A.T.M and on update of the aforesaid account in his passbook he came to know that on 08.09.2016  he has withdrawn a sum of Rs. 10,000/- but the complainant is not ready to accept that statement provided by the Bank authority as the complainant has not withdrawn the sum of Rs 10,000/-before or after 07/09/2016                                                                                                    Ld Advocate on behalf of the O.P draws our attention to the documents filed by them (vide annexture-A,B,C,D). It  appears  from  the  J.P. Log filed by the O.P that the transaction of Rs.10,000/- from the account of  the complainant was on 08/09/2016 at17:30 through using A.T.M.   J.P Log is completely system generated document as a proof of any  transaction against the A.T.M card of the complainant . It is not a fact that every person presumed to be liar though machine normally does not speak lie but man may do so. Sometime machine may fail. But in this present case as a civil matter complainant has to prove his claim by preponderance of evidence and we have limited scope in the summary trial.                       

  On perusal of the record and considering the argument advanced by the Ld. Advocates of the respective parties and documents filed by them, we do not find any deficiency on the part of the O.P. and the complainant has failed to prove his case , so the complainant is not entitled for any relief.

Reasons for delay

The Case was filed on 04.08.17 and admitted on10.08.17. This Forum tried its level best to dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible in terms of the provision under section 13(3A) of the CP Act, 1986. Delay in disposal of the case has also been explained in the day to day orders.

           

In the result, the Consumer case is dismissed..

            Fees paid are correct. Hence, it is

Ordered

that the complaint Case No. CC/123/2017 be and the same is hereby dismissed  on contest  against the OP but without any cost.

            Let plain copy of this order  be supplied free of cost, to each of the parties / Ld. Advocate/Agent on record, by hand  /by post under proper acknowledgment  as per rules, for information and necessary action.

The Final Order will also be available in the following Website:

confonet.nic.in

Dictated & corrected by me.

                       

            Member

    

   Member                                                                                      President.             

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. ASISH KUMAR SENAPATI]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. ALOKA BANDYOPADHYAY]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.