Orissa

Balangir

CC/4/2019

Sri Sesadev sahu - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, U.C.O Bank Titilagarh - Opp.Party(s)

13 Mar 2019

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM. BOLANGIR
ODISHA
 
Complaint Case No. CC/4/2019
( Date of Filing : 14 Feb 2019 )
 
1. Sri Sesadev sahu
At/Po/Ps:- Padmanavapur , Titilagarh
Bolangir
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Branch Manager, U.C.O Bank Titilagarh
At/Po/Ps:- Titilagarh
Bolangir
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Akashya Kumar Purohit PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Suniti Rath MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 13 Mar 2019
Final Order / Judgement

Adv. For the Complainant: - Self

Adv. For O.P                         :-  Self                    

Date  of filing of the Case  :- 14.02.2019

Date of Order                       :- 13.03.2019

 

JUDGMENT

Sri A.K.Purohit, President

         

    Complainant is present in person and filed some documents. Heard on the point of admission. Perused the complainant petition and the material available on record . The paddy crop of the complainant was insured under Prime  Minister  Crop Insurance Scheme for the year 2017-18. After receipt of Rs.9539/-  towards  insurance amount the complainant came to know that he was allowed as per the crops failure of Titilagarh Municipality, although his crops are under Tentelkhunti G.P. for which he was allowed a lesser amount as per declaration. As his representation before the Bank authority has not been considered the complainant has preferred this consumer complaint.

 

                         The crop insurance of the complainant is under the scheme of the government . According to the scheme it is the duty of the Bank to receive the application from in prescribed format and deduct  the premium amount from the account of the farmer and send the same to the insurance company as it is. In turn the insurance company after  verification and as per the crop failure declaration of the govt. Pay the insurance amount through Bank. Therefore the Bank has no authority to deal with the application form and in settlement of the insurance amount . In this  case the insurance company has not been added as party and the material available on record does not disclose a case against the O.P. Bank.

        Hence the case is dismissed as not admitted.  

 

                        Pronounced in the open Forum  to-day  i.e the  13th   day of  March 2019.

   Sd/-                                                                                                  Sd/-                                          (S.Rath)                                                                                    (A.K.Purohit)  

                        MEMBER.                                                                                   PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Akashya Kumar Purohit]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Suniti Rath]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.