Orissa

Rayagada

CC/72/2019

Sri Rutik Ranjan Behera - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, Tata Motors Finance Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Self

24 Nov 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, RAYAGADA, ODISHA.

Present:                                                         1. Sri Rajendra Kumar Panda, President.

                      2. Sri Satish Kumar Panigrahi, Member.

 

Date of Institution: 06.08.2019

       Date of Final Hearing: 10.11.2022

 

Consumer Complaint No. – 72/2019

 

Sri. RutikRanjanBehera,

S/o: Sri. GangadharBehera, At/PO: Neheru Nagar,

2nd Lane, Ps/Dist: Rayagada, Odisha-765001.                                               ....Complainant

                       

Versus

The Branch Manager, TATA Motors Finance Ltd.,

IMFL, Sambalpur, Branch, 2nd Floor, Balaji Towers,

G.M.College Road, Sambalpur, Dist: Sambapur,(Odisha)                             ....O.Ps/Respondents.

           

  • Representative for the complainant     ...Sri  Ram  Mohan Patnaik, Advocate.
  • Representative   for the O.Ps. 1 to 3    ... Sri Kaliprasanna Sahu,Advocate.
  • Date of Pronouncement                       ... 24.11.2022

Shri R.K.Panda, President.

                               

Brief facts of the case:-

Brief facts  of the case is that the  complainant alleging deficiency in service against the Opposite Parties (herein after called O.Ps)for non-issueof  N.O.C towards finance vehicle INDIGO  ECS LX  Car  bearing Regd. No.OD-02X-5565  for which  the complainant sought  redressal.

This District Commission examined the entire materials on record and given a thoughtful consideration tothe arguments advancedby the parties touching the points both on the facts as well as on law.

           

FINDING.

            During the course   of hearing the  O.Ps  1 to 3   have filed memo before the Commission where-in  they  submitted that after receiving the notice  from this commission  the  O.P( TATA finance) for issue of  NOC  towards finance vehicle INDIGO  ECS LX  Car  bearing Regd. No.OD-02X-5565. The O.Ps  had sent the N.O.C and related documents namely – 1,2,3 to the complainant  in form  of   speed post  bearing  No.ED558119081IN   Date.12.01.2021(copies of the postal receipt  is available in the file which is marked as Annexure-I.  Letter Dt. 4.1.2021 to the complainant by the O.P marked Annexure-2).

1.  Termination form 35 duly signed by the approving authority.

2. NOC addressed to the concerned RTO.

3. Letter to the insurance co. for deleting endorsement.

On perusal it found that   the complainant was found  absent in person on several adjournments  through notice  has been duly served  to confirm  the truth  of the version of the O.Ps.The advocate  for the complainant  also could not  able to produce the complainant but  being the  representative counsel  of the complainant  the advocate Sri Ram Mohan Patnaik  was present  during the course of hearing and not objected the memo Dated. 27.01.2022 filed by the O.Ps in respect of the issuance of NOC to the complainant.

            Heard the parties in view of the above facts and findings after perusal of therecord and memo filed by the O.Ps   inter alia other documents   issued by the O.Ps infavour of the complainant.  The memo dated. 27.01.2022 is allowed.

 

                                                                        ORDER.

            Accordingly the present dispute mitigated andthe O.Ps wriggled out from liabilities as per allegation by complainant on his complaint and hence the case disposed off on merit.   Parties are left to bear their own cost.

Interim Application proceedings pending, if any, stands disposed of in terms of the aforesaid  order.

A copy of this order be provided to all the parties at  free of cost as mandated by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 / 2019 or they may download same from the confonet.nic.in to treat the same as if copy of order received from this Commission.

The judgment be uploaded forthwith on the website of the Commission for the perusal of the parties.

File be consigned to the record room along with a copy of this Judgment.

 

                                MEMBER.                                                                            PRESIDENT.

Order dictated and corrected by me and pronounced in the open court on this   24th. Day of November, 2022 under our signature & seal of this commission.

                                  (RAJENDRA KUMAR PANDA)

                                                                                                                        PRESIDENT

                                                                                                                     (SATISH KUMAR PANIGRAHI)

                                                                                                                      MEMBER

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.