DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVALLUR
BEFORE TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI, M.A.,M.L, Ph.D (Law) .…. PRESIDENT
THIRU.J.JAYASHANKAR, B.A.,B.L., .....MEMBER-I
THIRU P.MURUGAN, M.Com., ICWA(Inter)., B.L., ….. MEMBER-II
CC. No.130/2022
THIS TUESDAY, THE 25th DAY OF OCTOBER 2022
1.Mrs.Nandhini Thiyagarajan, W/o.Mr.Thiyagarajan,
2.Mr.Thiyagarajan, S/o.L.Soundararajan.
Both residing at
Plot No.92, F1, 1st Avenue Street,
Chendurpuram Extn. – 1,
Kattupakkam, Chennai -600 056. ....Complainants.
//Vs//
1.The Branch Manager, State Bank of India,
Plot No.1157, Door No.137,
6th Avenue, Anna Nagar, (West), Chennai -600 040.
2.The Manager, State Bank of India, RACPC,
D-128, 3rd &4th Floor,
1st Main Road, Near Chinthamani Circle,
Anna Nagar East, Chennai -600 102.
3.The Zonal Manager, State Bank of India,
Chennai Zonal Office,
Old No.21, Rajaji Salai, Chennai -600 001.
4.The General Manager, State Bank of India,
Local Head Office,
No.16, Circletop House,
Aparna Complex, 7th Floor,
College Road, Greames Road, Chennai -600 006. ....Opposite parties.
Counsel for the complainant : M/sAswani Kamal, Advocate.
Counsel for the opposite parties : Mr.Nattarajan Gopinath, Advocate.
ORDER
PRONOUNCED BY TMT. Dr.S.M. LATHA MAHESWARI, PRESIDENT.
The complaint was filed by the complainant U/S 12 of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties with regard to the loan repayments by way of EMIs along with a prayer to direct the opposite parties to sent a proper written communication stating, when and how the amount of Rs.29,885/- is due in their loan account maintained with the 1st opposite party and to pay interest for the balance loan amount of Rs.1,00,000/- from 25.10.2017 to 18.09.2018 and to pay a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- towards compensation for the mental agony and hardship caused to the complainant due to the deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties along with cost of the proceedings.
No representation for complainant. Notice served. Information given. Inspite of the same no appearance by the complainant and proof affidavit was also not filed by them. Hence, this commission is of the view that the no purpose in keeping the complaint on file. Hence this complaint is dismissed for default. No cost.
This order was pronounced by us in the open Commission on this 25th October 2022.
Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-
MEMBER-II MEMBER-I PRESIDENT