Maharashtra

StateCommission

MA/10/374

DR SATWANT SINGH GARCHA - Complainant(s)

Versus

THE BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA - Opp.Party(s)

ANITA MURUGUD

13 Jan 2012

ORDER

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
 
Miscellaneous Application No. MA/10/374
 
1. DR SATWANT SINGH GARCHA
SARDAR HOUSE OPP MUNCIPLE HOSPITAL RAJAWADI 1 ST ROAD GHATKOPAR (E)MUMBAI
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. THE BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA
MAHUL ROAD BRANCH CHEMBUR MUMBAI
MUMBAI
MAHARASHTRA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 Hon'ble Mr. P.N. Kashalkar PRESIDING MEMBER
 Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar Member
 
PRESENT:
Adv. Anita Murgude on behalf of the Applicant/Appellant
......for the Appellant
 
Adv. M. G. Nadkarni on behalf of the Non-Applicant/Respondent
......for the Respondent
ORDER

Common order in MA/10/374 in A/10/701 & MA/10/375 in A/10/702

 

Per – Hon’ble Mr. P. N. Kashalkar, Presiding Judicial Member

 

          Heard Adv. Anita Murgude on behalf of the Applicant/ Appellant and Adv. M. G. Nadkarni on behalf of the Non-Applicant/Respondent on the application for condonation of delay.

 

[2]     In filing this appeal there is a delay of 132 days.  It is submitted on behalf of the Applicant/Appellant that delay has primarily occurred because the Applicant/Appellant was suffering from acute sciatica.  To support this contention, the Applicant/ Appellant has produced on the record a medical certificate issued by Dr. G. N. Gandhi, who advised complete bed-rest to the Applicant/Appellant.  Thus, looking to the illness the Applicant/ Appellant was suffering from, we are finding that this is a just and proper cause properly mentioned in the delay condonation application to seek condonation of delay of 132 days.  We have no hitch in allowing the application for condonation of delay though it is strongly opposed by the Non-Applicant/Respondent.

 

ORDER

 

Miscellaneous Application No.374 of 2010 seeking condonation of delay in filing Appeal No.701 of 2010, so also, Miscellaneous Application No.375 of 2010 seeking condonation of delay in filing Appeal No.702 of 2010 are hereby allowed.  Consequently, the delay in filing these two appeals stands condoned subject to payment of costs of `1,000/- to be paid by the Applicant/ Appellant to the Non-Applicant/Respondent, in each appeal, within a period of 30 days from today (since the order is passed in presence of the parties) and failing which, without any further reference to the State Commission, the application for condonation of delay shall automatically stand dismissed

 

 

Pronounced and dictated on 13th January, 2012

 

 
 
[Hon'ble Mr. P.N. Kashalkar]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.