Punjab

Patiala

CC/21/512

Jasbir Jassi - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager Star Health and Ailled Insurance Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Sh.Parminder Singh Sidhu

16 Sep 2024

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Patiala
Patiala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/21/512
( Date of Filing : 01 Nov 2021 )
 
1. Jasbir Jassi
R/O H No-4 Rose Colony Patiala
Patiala
Punjab
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Branch Manager Star Health and Ailled Insurance Company Limited
SCO No-17 First Floor Kandhari Complex Stadium Road Patiala
Patiala
Punjab
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Pushvinder Singh PRESIDENT
  Gurdev Singh Nagi MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 16 Sep 2024
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

PATIALA.

 

                                      Consumer Complaint No. 512 of 1.11.2021

                                      Decided on: 16.9.2024

 

Jasbir Jassi aged 28 years, s/o Raj Kumar, resident of H.No.4, Rose Colony, Patiala.

Aadhar No.7790 8053 9082  .

 

                                                                   …………...Complainant

                                      Versus

The Branch Manager, Star Health and Allied Insurance Company Limited, SCO No.17, First Floor, Kandhari Complex, Stadium Road, Patiala.

                                                                   …………Opposite Party

 

Complaint under the Consumer Protection Act

 

QUORUM

                                      Sh.Pushvinder Singh, President

                                      Sh.G.S.Nagi, Member   

 

ARGUED BY

                                      Sh.P.S.Sidhu, counsel for complainant.

                                      Sh.Amit Gupta, counsel for OP.                

 

                                     

 ORDER

                                      PUSHVINDER SINGH, PRESIDENT

  1. The instant complaint is filed by Jasbir Jassi (hereinafter referred to as the complainant) against The Branch Manager, Star Health and Allied Insurance Company Limited, (hereinafter referred to as the OP/s) under the Consumer Protection Act ( for short the Act).
  2. It is averred in the complaint that the complainant purchased CORONA RAKSHAK insurance policy bearing No. P/211115/01/2021/006752 dated 7.1.2021 for the period 7.1.2021 to 20.7.2021 from the OP for the sum insured of Rs.2,50,000/-.The complainant paid premium of Rs.5445/-.The policy was effective from 22.1.2021 after expiration of the waiting period for securing himself from CORONA virus . It is averred that policy  covered only  COVID-19 positive diagnosis and the OP shall not be liable for any claim if the insured detected Covid-19/ Corona positive within 15 days from the date of policy. It is averred that as per the terms and conditions of the policy Covid is covered lump sum benefit of equal to 100% of the sum insured which shall be payable POSITIVE diagnosis from a Govt. authorized diagnostic centre and requiring hospitalization  for a minimum period of 72 hours , then the insured has to file claim within 30 days of discharge from the hospital.
  3.  It averred that on 19.2.2021 complainant conducted RT PCR test  from Govt. Medical College, Patiala and as per test report dated 20.2.2021, he was diagnosed Covid Positive case and as such complainant admitted himself in Govt. Rajindra Hospital Patiala on 20.2.2021 vide CR No.4503 dated 20.2.2021 and remained admitted  under Corona treatment till 24.4.2021. That after discharge from the hospital, complainant intimated the OP for getting claim under the policy in question which was registered under claim bearing No.CIR/2022/211115/2458905. The complainant also submitted all the requisite documents with the OP for getting the claim. It is averred that the complainant received a letter dated 10.9.2021 regarding repudiation of the claim by the OP on the ground of non submission of documents. That thereafter complainant served legal notice dated 21.9.2021 and also sent requisite documents alongwith the  legal notice to the OP but despite of receipt of legal notice and documents OP did not pay any heed to the request of the complainant. That the repudiation of claim  by the OP is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice. There is also deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the OP which caused mental agony and harassment to the complainant. Hence this complaint with the prayer to accept the same by giving directions to the OP to pay 100% amount of sum insured i.e. Rs.2,50,000/- and also to pay Rs.25000/-as compensation for causing mental agony and harassment and costs of litigation expenses.
  4. Upon notice, OP appeared through counsel and filed written statement having raised preliminary objections that  the complainant proposed to get himself insured under the Corona Rakshak  Policy  which was issued vide policy No.P/211115/01/2021/006752 for the period of 7.1.2021 to 20.7.2021, strictly subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, issued to the complainant. 
  5. It is pleaded that the complainant intimated one claim under the aforesaid policy with regard to her admission in the Rajindra Hospital, Patiala  w.e.f.20.2.2021 to 24.2.2021 for the treatment of Covid-19 and the claim was duly processed under the terms and conditions of the policy. However, as per condition No.7.3 of the above policy, the insured person has to submit all the required documents and details called for by the insurance company. Investigation reports including insured person’s test reports from  authorized diagnostic centre for covid but the insured has failed to submit the same and the claim of the complainant was rejected vide letter dated 8.11.2021.
  6. On merits, it is admitted by the OP that the policy in question was issued to the complainant. It is also admitted that claim was lodged by the complainant with regard to the treatment/hospitalization w.e.f. 20.2.2021 to 24.2.2021 at Rajindra Hospital, Patiala for the treatment of covid.  Further the OP has reiterated the facts taken in the preliminary objections which are not repeated for the sake of brevity. The OP has alleged that there is no deficiency in service on its part .After denying all other averments OP has prayed for dismissal of the complaint.
  7. In evidence, ld. counsel for the complainant has tendered in evidence Ex.CA affidavit of the complainant alongwith documents Exs.C1 to C7 and closed evidence.
  8. On the other hand, ld. counsel for the OP has tendered in evidence Ex.OPA affidavit of Sh.Sumit Kumar Sharma, alongwith documents i.e. Ex.OP1 copy of online proposal form, Ex.OP2 copy of policy schedule, Ex.OP3 copy of terms and conditions of policy, Ex.OP4 copy of filed visit report,Ex.OP5 copy of discharge summary dated 24.2.2020, Ex.OP6 copy of query letter dated 27.7.2021, Ex.OP7 copy of 1st reminder dated 11.8.2021, Ex.OP8 copy of 2nd reminder dated 26.8.2021, Ex.OP9 copy of rejection letter dated 10.9.2021,Ex.OP10 copy of repudiation letter dated 8.11.2021,Ex.OP11 copy of CD of voice recording and closed the evidence.
  9. Written arguments by the complainant have been filed. We have gone through the same,  heard the ld. counsel for the parties and have also gone through the record of the case, carefully.  
  10. It is the admitted fact that the complainant purchased CORONA RAKSHAK insurance policy, as per Ex.C1, for a consideration of Rs.5445/-. The policy was valid for the period 7.1.2021 to 20.7.2021  i.e. for 195 days,  for the sum insured of Rs.2,50,000/-. As per the terms and conditions of the policy, Ex.OP3, produced by the OP, the COVID COVER, as per clause 4.1 was available to all insured persons and lump sum benefit equal to 100% of the sum insured was payable on positive diagnosis of covid subject to admission in hospital for a minimum continuous period of 72 hours and that positive diagnosis of covid shall be from a Govt. authorized diagnostic centre. This was a onetime benefit applicable to the policy holder during the tenure of the policy and was to terminate on payment of the benefit.
  11. The complainant submitted sample for RT PCR test  to Gobind Path Labs, Patiala under SRF id No.0304100359251  on 19.2.2021 and as per test report dated 20.2.2021 and SMS of PB Govt.,Ex.C3, he was diagnosed Covid Positive. The complainant was admitted in Govt. Rajindra Hospital Patiala on 20.2.2021 as a case of covid positive and was discharged on 24.2.2021 in stable condition, as per discharge summary Ex.C4 i.e. after three days of the admission .The complainant was advised to quarantine for seven days.   
  12. The complainant then applied for claim as per the policy with the OP and the claim was duly registered by the OP under claim intimation No.CIR/2022/211115/2458905, as per Ex.C5. The complainant has alleged that all the documents were submitted by him at the time of submission of the claim. However, the claim was repudiated vide letter dated 10.9.2021, Ex.C5, on the ground of non submission of documents. The legal notice, Ex.C6 was subsequently served upon the OP by the complainant. However, no response was received by the complainant against the said legal notice.
  13. We are of the opinion that the claim of the complainant is to be considered strictly as per the terms and conditions of the insurance policy issued by the OP, copy of which is Ex.OP3. Clause 4.1 of the said insurance policy relating to the Covid Cover states that ;

“Lump sum benefit equal to 100% of the sum insured shall be payable on positive diagnosis of covid, requiring hospitalization for a minimum continuous period of 72 hours. The positive diagnosis of covid shall be from a Govt. authorized diagnostic centre”.

  1. The complainant was diagnosed as covid positive as per the test report Ex.C3, and the complainant was then hospitalized from 20.2.2021 to 24.2.2021, as per discharge summary, Ex.C4 i.e. for a period of more than 72 hours and fulfills all the conditions for the coverage of Covid Cover and benefits admissible thereof under the said policy. Even the documents demanded by the OP at the time of repudiation namely test results (Ex.C3) discharge summary (Ex.C4) have been produced by the complainant.
  2. As such we are of the opinion that the complainant is entitled  for a claim of Rs.2,50,000/- i.e. sum insured as he fulfills all the terms and conditions of the policy. We therefore allow the complaint and direct the OP to settle the claim of Rs.2,50,000/- alongwith interest @6% per annum from the date of rejection of the claim till realization. The OP is also directed to pay Rs.5000/-as compensation for causing mental agony and harassment to the complainant alongwith Rs.5000/-as costs of litigation. Compliance of the order be made by the OP within 45 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.            
  3.           The instant complaint could not be disposed of within stipulated period due to heavy rush of work and for want of Quorum from long time.
  4.  
  5.  

                                              G.S.Nagi                           PUSHVINDER SINGH

                                              Member                          President

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Pushvinder Singh]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Gurdev Singh Nagi]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.