Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/6/2020

Smt. Trupti Pattanayak, aged about 55 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, Sriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd., Nuasahi - Opp.Party(s)

Sj. Nirmal Kumar Nayak & Others

10 Sep 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/6/2020
( Date of Filing : 03 Feb 2020 )
 
1. Smt. Trupti Pattanayak, aged about 55 years
W/o. Subhra Narayan Pattanayak, At/P.O- Angargadia, P.S- Industrial Area, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Branch Manager, Sriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd., Nuasahi
Near Maheswari Bhawan, P.S- Sahadevkhunta, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
2. The Regional Manager, Sriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd., Bhubaneswar
Jayadev Vihar, Bhubaneswar.
Khordha
Odisha
3. The Managing Director/C.E.O, Sriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd., Navi Mumbai
101-105, 1st Floor, B Wing, Shiv Chambers, Sector-11, CBD-Belapur, Navi Mumbai-400614.
Maharashtra
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 10 Sep 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case is posted today for hearing. Advocate for the complainant is absent, no steps filed. O.P No.1 is absent. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up. Perused the case record.

                                         As the notice against O.P No.1 was sufficient and he neither appeared nor filed w/v, hence the O.P No.1 is set ex-parte. In the present case, the O.P No.1 is set ex-parte and the case against O.Ps No.2 & 3 was dismissed. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 26.03.2020 to till today except 29.11.2021, 15.12.2022 & 26.05.2023, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. In the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is presumed that the complainant has no interest to prosecute his own case. Considering the nature & conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.