BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I

U.T. CHANDIGARH

Criminal Complaint No. 106 of 2010

in

Complaint Case No.596 of 2006

Nirmal Singh, Prop. M/s Nirmal Enterprises, 87 K.Market, Industrial Area, Phase I, Chandigarh.                                                 

                                                                              –          Complainant

                                                            Versus

The Branch Manager, Speedage Cargo Service, Plot No.174, Industrial Area, Phase 2, Ram Darbar, Chandigarh.

–                    Opposite Party

Present:           None for the Complainant.

ORDER

                        The case was called out several times but neither the complainant nor anybody else on his behalf has turned up. Notice of the execution application was sent to OP but the same had been received back with the report “shifted”. The complainant was to furnish the correct address but it appears that he has not been able to find out the same and therefore none has appeared for the complainant. The application is accordingly dismissed for non prosecution. However, the complainant may file afresh application as and when the correct address of OP comes to his knowledge, as permitted by law.

                        Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties.  The file be consigned.

24.02.2011                 (MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA)                        (RAJINDER SINGH GILL)      

                                                                MEMBER                                                     PRESIDING   MEMBER