Orissa

Rayagada

CC/89/2019

Sri M.Ramu - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, Shriram Transport Finance Co, Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Sri VRM Patnaik

04 Aug 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT   CONSUMER DISPUTES  REDRESSAL COMMISSION, RAYAGADA,

AT:  KASTURI NAGAR, Ist.  LANE,   L.I.C. OFFICE     BACK,PO/DIST: RAYAGADA, STATE:  ODISHA, PIN NO.765001,.E-mail- dcdrfrgda@gmail.com

 

C.C.CASE  NO.__89_______/2019                          Date.   4.8.2022         

P R E S E N T .

 

Dr. Aswini  Kumar  Mohapatra,                                     President.

Sri   Satish  Kumar  Panigrahi.                                         Member

 

Sri M.Ramu, Po/Dist:Rayagada(Odisha) 765 001

                                                                        ….  Complainant.

Versus.

 

1.The Branch Manager, Sriram Finance Transport  Co. Ltd., Rayagada and 2others.

                                                                        …Opposite  Parties.

 

 

For the Complainant:- Self..

For the  O.Ps:- Sri  Ram Prasad Patra, Advocate, Rayagada.

 

JUDGEMENT

 

 Brief facts of the case summarized here under.  That  the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps    for  non issue of NOC towards finance vehicle  Regd. No. 18-B-7839  for which  the complainant  sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant. 

             Both the  parties are present and submitted that  both the parties are settled the matter out of court and not interested  to proceed the case further and  prays the commission to close the case and he is not interested to proceed the case further.

The O.Ps  considering the exigencies   of  the matter with out any basis   in the right time properly settled the disputes  at his end to avoid further litigation by  over looking  all the deficiencies  without contesting the present case  in the sense of humanitarian point of view  by following  the principles of  natural  justice in view of justice as contemplated  the  Modos  Operandi  of the O.Ps   no doubt  worthy of credence.

                This forum  perused the memo   filed by the complainant  as well as the O.Ps.   Memo is allowed.

                Accordingly the present dispute mitigated  and the  case stands disposed  and  the O.Ps wriggled out of  liabilities & the  case closed against  them    as  the  complainant   does not want to  proceed  with  the case further against the O.Ps  .

 

Dictated and corrected by me

Pronounced on this               4 th.         Day of     August,   2022.

               

                 

                                                                                Member.                                      President

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.