Orissa

Rayagada

CC/227/2016

Sri Raj Kumar Nayak - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager, Shiram Transport Finance Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Self

09 Jun 2017

ORDER

DISTRICT   CONSUMER  DISPUTES REDRESSAL    FORUM, RAYAGADA,

STATE:  ODISHA.

C.C. Case  No.  227/ 2016.                                Date.      11  .     1  . 2019

P R E S E N T .

Dr. Aswini  Kumar Mohapatra,              President.

Sri  GadadharaSahu,                                             Member.

Smt. Padmalaya  Mishra,                                     Member.

 

Sri Raj Kumar Nayak,  S/O: Narendra Kumar Nayak, Raniguda Farm,  Dist:Rayagada,  765 011  (Odisha)                                              …. Complainant.

Versus.

1.The  Bramch   Manager, M/S. Sriram  Transport Finance Co. Ltd., Ist. Floor, Binayak Plaza, New Swagat Hotel, New Colony,  Rayagada.                                              .…..Opp.Parties

Counsel for the parties:                         

For the complainant: - Self.

For the O.Ps:- Sri K.Ch.G.S.Kumandan, Advocate, Rayagada.

 

                                                            JUDGEMENT

      

       The  curx of the case is that  the above named complainant alleging deficiency in service  against  afore mentioned O.Ps    for  non issue  of NOC towards finance vehicle OR-18-D-0696   for which  the complainant  sought for redressal of the grievances raised by the complainant.

       On being noticed the O.P. appeared before the forum through their learned counsel and filed a memo submitted that the complainant and the O.Ps have  settled the matter out of the court and the complainant has paid the settled amount to  the O.P. on Dt.18.4,2017, and NOC had been issued in favour of the complainant towards the finance vehicle OR-18- D-0696 by the O.Ps to subside the  present dispute between the complainant & O.Ps  with full and final  satisfaction  of  the complaint  and provide proper service  and no claim further  against them from the complainant as the dispute solved  among themselves. Hence the O.P. prays the forum to dispose the case accordingly  as settled out of the court.

       Heard from the parties. During the course of hearing the complainant has not objected the memo filed by  the O.P.  Perused  the   record  and  memo  filed by the O.P.  The memo is allowed.

                Accordingly the present dispute mitigated  and the  case stands disposed  off  but O.Ps wriggled out of  liabilities & the  case closed against  them    as  the  complainant   do not want to  proceed  with  the case further against the O.Ps  after settled the matter amicably out of court.  Parties are left  to bear their own cost.

Dictated and corrected by me.       Pronounced on this            11th    Day of       January, 2019.

               

                 Member.                                                            Member.                                      President

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.