Kerala

Idukki

CC/102/2016

George K J - Complainant(s)

Versus

The Branch Manager SBT - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.Lissy M M

30 Mar 2017

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,
IDUKKI
 
Complaint Case No. CC/102/2016
( Date of Filing : 22 Mar 2016 )
 
1. George K J
Koloth House Mankulam P O,
Idukki
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. The Branch Manager SBT
Munnar
Idukki
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. S Gopakumar PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Benny K MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 30 Mar 2017
Final Order / Judgement

DATE OF FILING : 22.3.2016

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKI

Dated this the 30th day of March, 2017

Present :

SRI. S. GOPAKUMAR PRESIDENT

SRI. BENNY. K. MEMBER

CC NO.102/2016

Between

Complainant : George K.J.,

Koloth House,

Mankulam P.O.,

Idukki.

(By Adv: Lissy M.M.)

And

Opposite Party : The Branch Manager,

State Bank of Travancore,

Munnar Branch,

Munnar, Idukki.

 

O R D E R

 

SRI. S. GOPAKUMAR, PRESIDENT

 

Case of the complainant is that

 

Complainant is the account holder of opposite party bank with account No.67024054962 and deposited an amount of Rs.3000/- on 26.11.2006 in this account. Out of this, he withdrawn an amount of Rs.2500/- and kept Rs.500/- therein. In November 2015, the complainant got a letter from opposite party bank demanding to pay an amount of Rs.12,125/- as charges in the complainant's above said SB Account. The complainant further stated that, he is no way liable to pay the amount demanded and the act of the opposite party is sheer deficiency in service and unfair trade practice filed this complaint for withdraw the said notice and declare the complainant that he is not liable to pay the amount and also direct the opposite parties to pay compensation and cost.

 

Opposite party entered appearance and filed detailed version. In their version, opposite party specifically contended that, the complainant is not entitled for any relief as bank has not made any demand for Rs.12,125/- in the said SB Account as alleged by the complainant.

(cont.....2)

- 2 -

 

Hence being satisfied with the averment and admission of the opposite party bank that, they had not issued any demand notice as alleged or has not initiated any revenue recovery proceedings against the complainant, the complainant submitted that he is not interested to prosecute the matter.

 

Hence the complaint closed.

 

Pronounced in the Open Forum on this the 30th day of March, 2017

 

 

Sd/-

SRI. S. GOPAKUMAR, PRESIDENT

Sd/-

SRI. BENNY. K., MEMBER

 

 

Forwarded by Order,

 

 

 

SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. S Gopakumar]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Benny K]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.